[GRASS-dev] Re: include wxgrass or not in 6.3.0
landa.martin at gmail.com
Sun Feb 10 08:10:01 EST 2008
2008/2/10, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org>:
> (I have taken liberty to replace the funky
> Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: grass-dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 33
> On Feb 9, 2008 7:40 PM, Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu> wrote:
> > On Feb 9, 2008, at 5:58 AM, grass-dev-request at lists.osgeo.org wrote:
> > > From: "Martin Landa" <landa.martin at gmail.com>
> > > 2008/2/9, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>:
> > >>> For 6.3.X, I would envision a release that includes work
> > >>> on the Win32 port, wxGUI/Python stuff and 3D capabilities.
> > >>
> > >> Good point. Should be wxGUI included in 6.3.0. If so, I propose to
> > >> apply changes in configure , and to copy gui/wxpython to
> > >> releasebranch_6_3 before 6.3.0 will be tagged. (?)
> > >
> > > correction: Should be wxGUI included in 6.3.0?
> > >
> > >> From my point of view: -0
> > >
> > > So:
> > > 6.3.x - no wxgui
> > > 6.4.x - wxgui included
> > I think that wxPython GUI *should* be included in 6.3.0.
> What about doing it in 6.3.1? We had 4 release candidates now and
> it wasn't included. I would like to see at least one RC with that included
> before officially publishing it.
unfortunately, it has been included, even worse the old wxPython code!! see
I would imagine copy of wxpython stuff in 6.3.0 (based on this
situation). Changes in configure  or  would eventually become
part of 6.3.1 (if so).
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
More information about the grass-dev