[GRASS-dev] GSoC, reimplementation of modules v.voronoi and v.delaunay

[Benjamin Ducke]

Hi,

sorry for joining this discussion late, I was away all last week,
but will now be available for support via email.

First of all, congrats on being accepted to the GSoC!

Second, I agree that users need to be able to have two distinct modules,
otherwise they will wonder where to find their stuff.

One alternative you might want to consider is creating two separate
binaries v.voronoi and v.delaunay using two Makefile targets
that share exactly the same code base.
You could then simply use argv[0] to check which one the user called
and use appropriate program logics to set up GRASS options and
parameters etc.

Best,

Benjamin


----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Pavlovsky" <mpavlovsky at gmail.com>
To: "Paul Kelly" <paul-grass at stjohnspoint.co.uk>
Cc: "Wolf Bergenheim" <wolf+grass at bergenheim.net>, "GRASS developers list" <grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: 26 April 2008 08:16:57 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] GSoC, reimplementation of modules v.voronoi and v.delaunay

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


------
Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit http://iso26300.info for more information.