[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2409: last call for options keys consolidation

[GRASS GIS]

#2409: last call for options keys consolidation
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
 Reporter:  martinl               |       Owner:  grass-dev@…              
     Type:  task                  |      Status:  new                      
 Priority:  blocker               |   Milestone:  7.0.0                    
Component:  Default               |     Version:  unspecified              
 Keywords:  standardized options  |    Platform:  Unspecified              
      Cpu:  Unspecified           |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment(by hcho):

 Replying to [comment:111 annakrat]:
 > Replying to [comment:108 martinl]:
 >
 > > Personally I would tend to rename just
 >
 >   * element name `raster_3d` (or `raster3d`)
 >   * module options e.g. `d.legend raster_3d`
 >
 > > I would not touch names of the modules, some of them already use
 shorten names, eg. `d.rast.leg`, so I would keep `rast3d`. Similarly I
 would not touch python module names.
 > >
 > > Any opinion from other devs?
 >
 > I don't really like the underscore, I would go with raster3d, I think we
 can manage to type raster3d because 3D rasters are generally not used as
 often as rasters.

 I agree. I don't like the underscore either. Maybe, the parser could treat
 numbers just like the underscore so that we can shorten raster3d as r3.

 >
 > I would keep the names of modules as they are now.

 Like Martin mentioned, I don't think we need to change module names if we
 go for raster3d because other modules already use short names.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2409#comment:113>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>