[GRASS-dev] osgeo4w package for GRASS 7

Vaclav Petras wenzeslaus at gmail.com
Sat Feb 21 14:50:21 PST 2015


On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hellik at web.de> wrote:

> > I don't like svn in package names. Daily expresses much better what it
> is.
> > It is not the current state of svn, it is a daily build. With leaving out
> > the daily builds of current release branch (now 70), it would be just:
> >
> > * `grass` - latest stable release
> > * `grass6` - latest stable release of 6.x series
> > * `grass-daily` - daily build of trunk
> >
> > In my suggestion I suppose that we don't need to package daily builds of
> > current release branch (now 70). However, I'm not sure how to deal with
> > betas and RCs. Should they be also accessible just through standalone
> > installer? Or are they considered as "latest stable release" and thus for
> > example, 7.0.1RC1 would replace 7.0.0 in package `grass`?
> >
>
> why not just retire OSGeo4W-grass6 after grass 7.0.1 will be released?
>
> IMHO regarding testing/improving g7 by devs _and_ users, it's better to
> have
> relbranch7 dailys ready in OSGeo4W than fading out grass6.
>

 * `grass` - latest stable release (alternatively `grass7`)
 * `grass6` - latest stable release of 6.x series
( * `grass6-daily` - daily build of current 6.x branch, optional)
 * `grass7-daily` - daily build of current 7.x branch
 * `grass-daily` - daily build of trunk

I'm not entirely comfortable with `grass-daily` and `grass7-daily` but it
would be good enough for me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20150221/0a1fde82/attachment.html>


More information about the grass-dev mailing list