Hello Glynn,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/8/15 Glynn Clements <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:glynn@gclements.plus.com">glynn@gclements.plus.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
Hamish wrote:<br>
<br>
> As for including LGPL code in the main trunk I personally don't have a<br>
> problem with that as it reflects the upstream license/author's wishes,<br>
> is new code, and is used as a library. By my reading the RFC2 doc nor<br>
> 'g.version -c' & the COPYING file need any adjustment to cover this.<br>
> But a formal decision on that may be a matter for the PSC.<br>
><br>
> As long as everything in the lib/ccmath/ dir falls under the same (GPL<br>
> compatible) license and the LGPL.txt file is placed in that dir I'd be<br>
> happy.<br>
<br>
</div>If it's being included in the main GRASS tree, it would be simpler to<br>
relicense it as GPL.</blockquote><div><br>So we have to convince the author Daniel A. Atkinson <br>to relicense the ccmath library as GPL code?<br>The only email address i have found is: <a href="mailto:DanAtk@aol.com">DanAtk@aol.com</a>.<br>
I personally prefer to keep the LGPL license for ccmath. <br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
<br>
The main thing is to ensure that each file has a header stating that<br>
it is licensed under the LGPL. In the absence of such a header, we<br>
can't reasonably assume that any additions to the code are licensed<br>
under the LGPL.</blockquote><div><br>I will ensure this.<br><br>Best regards<br>Soeren <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Glynn Clements <<a href="mailto:glynn@gclements.plus.com">glynn@gclements.plus.com</a>><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>