<p>Hi,<br>
The suggested naming scheme sounds reasonable. Following this scheme, modules should named like this?:</p>
<p>t.*:<br>
t.create<br>
t.sample<br>
t.topology<br>
...</p>
<p>t.rast.*:<br>
t.rast.aggregate<br>
t.rast.to.rast3<br>
t.rast.mapcalc<br>
...</p>
<p>t.rast3.*:<br>
t.rast3.mapcalc<br>
t.rast3.extract<br>
t.rast3.list<br>
...</p>
<p>t.vect.*:<br>
t.vect.what.strds<br>
t.vect.observe.strds<br>
t.vect.extract<br>
...</p>
<p>Does this sounds correct and reduces confusion?</p>
<p>Best regards<br>
Soeren</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Am 29.03.2012 18:36 schrieb "Markus Neteler" <<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org">neteler@osgeo.org</a>>:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
2012/3/29 Martin Landa <<a href="mailto:landa.martin@gmail.com">landa.martin@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> 2011/10/20 Sören Gebbert <<a href="mailto:soerengebbert@googlemail.com">soerengebbert@googlemail.com</a>>:<br>
>> with the temporal extension i introduce new datatypes to grass7:<br>
...<br>
>> The purpose of the t.* modules is to ...<br>
<br>
This is the right prefix... while<br>
<br>
> I would like to open the discussion about this topic again, before<br>
> tgis extension will be announced and users will start to use it. I<br>
> would suggest to use only *one* prefix (`t.`) for TGIS. To extend<br>
> current list of prefixes (r., v., etc) with so many new prefixes which<br>
> are related to the one topic (in this case temporal GIS) is not good<br>
> idea I think. Moreover it will make user manual less readable [1] -<br>
> see t.*, tr.* and so on. I would propose rename eg `tr.` to `t.rast.`,<br>
> and so on.<br>
<br>
.. I agree with Martin that we currently get a confusing list of new<br>
prefixes which are not in line with the existing naming scheme.<br>
<br>
Markus<br>
</blockquote></div>