<div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I was trying to fix failing test of r.profile:</div><div><a href="http://fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu/grassgistests/reports_for_date-2014-10-19-07-00/report_for_nc_spm_08_grass7_nc/raster/r.profile/test_profile_ncspm/index.html">http://fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu/grassgistests/reports_for_date-2014-10-19-07-00/report_for_nc_spm_08_grass7_nc/raster/r.profile/test_profile_ncspm/index.html</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>which is working on 32-bit machine. I committed this change:</div><div><a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/62299">http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/62299</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>which fixed it but I was wondering, if r.profile shouldn't use atan2 instead of atan? It seems that the division in atan could possibly lead to overflow? But nobody complained about it yet... Tests work with atan2.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>Anna</div><div><br></div></div>