<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Michael Barton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Michael.Barton@asu.edu" target="_blank">Michael.Barton@asu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
<div><span class="">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 PM, Anna Petrášová <<a href="mailto:kratochanna@gmail.com" target="_blank">kratochanna@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br>
<div><br>
<br style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman;font-size:13px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div class="gmail_quote" style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman;font-size:13px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Michael Barton<span> </span><span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Michael.Barton@asu.edu" target="_blank">Michael.Barton@asu.edu</a>></span><span> </span>wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
In r.to.vect, this argument ONLY refers to the output vector feature. There are not any different feature types for the 2D raster maps that are input to this module. I assume that while the nature of the raster map affects the vector feature type to some extent,
this argument can force it to output a particular feature type when there is the potential for multiple feature type output.<br>
<br>
I suppose simply “feature type” is OK. But it is the output vector map that is being referred to in any case and “input” feature type is misleading IMHO.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Probably revert<span> </span><a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/59324" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/59324</a>? Or create separate options G_OPT_V_TYPE_INPUT, G_OPT_V_TYPE_OUTPUT?</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</span><div>But the input is always a raster. So there is no reason for an option <span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman">G_OPT_V_TYPE_INPUT</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman">The output is always a vector, which CAN have different feature types, so there is a reason for </span><span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman">G_OPT_V_TYPE_OUTPUT.</span></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I was talking about introducing new standard options <span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman;font-size:13px">G_OPT_V_TYPE_INPUT, G_OPT_V_TYPE_OUTPUT which would differ only in description (Input feature type/Output feature type). r.to.vect would then use </span><span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman;font-size:13px">G_OPT_V_TYPE_OUTPUT, v.to.rast would use </span> <span style="font-size:13px;font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman">G_OPT_V_TYPE_INPUT. Or we just stay with </span><span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman;font-size:13px">G_OPT_V_TYPE and redefine description.</span></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><span class=""><font color="#888888">
<div><span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman">Michael</span></div></font></span><span class="">
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote" style="font-family:BitstreamVeraSerif-Roman;font-size:13px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Anna</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span><br>
Michael<br>
____________________<br>
C. Michael Barton<br>
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity<br>
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change<br>
Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science<br>
Arizona State University<br>
<br>
voice: <span> </span><a href="tel:480-965-6262" value="+14809656262" target="_blank">480-965-6262</a><span> </span>(SHESC),<span> </span><a href="tel:480-965-8130" value="+14809658130" target="_blank">480-965-8130</a>/727-9746
(CSDC)<br>
fax:<span> </span><a href="tel:480-965-7671" value="+14809657671" target="_blank">480-965-7671</a><span> </span>(SHESC), <span> </span><a href="tel:480-727-0709" value="+14807270709" target="_blank">480-727-0709</a><span> </span>(CSDC)<br>
www:<span> </span><a href="http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton" target="_blank">http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton</a>,<span> </span><a href="http://csdc.asu.edu/" target="_blank">http://csdc.asu.edu</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>
<div>
<div>On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Markus Neteler <<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org" target="_blank">neteler@osgeo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Michael Barton <<a href="mailto:Michael.Barton@asu.edu" target="_blank">Michael.Barton@asu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I just ran into this last night.<br>
>><br>
>> The description for the “type” argument for r.to.vect calls it “Input<br>
>> feature type”, but actually it should be “Output feature type”.<br>
><br>
> I'm not sure. The raster input defines also the output to some extent.<br>
> In G6 it was simply called "Feature type", perhaps we should restore<br>
> that description?<br>
><br>
> Markus<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
grass-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</span></div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>