<div dir="ltr"><div>Hello everybody, <br></div><div><br></div><div>I wonder if this discussion should also be moved to a RFC [1]. What do you think? <br></div><div>If yes, is there anyone willing to draft it detailing background, advantages, <br></div><div>disadvantages and alternatives?</div><div><br></div><div>It might be interesting to know how many OSGeo projects use it and how it</div><div>works for them. It was mentioned here that QGIS PSC is considering to close it, <br></div><div>but what about others?</div><div><br></div><div>my 2 cents</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,<br></div><div>Vero<br></div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC">https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC</a> </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El mié, 10 feb 2021 a las 15:28, Stefan Blumentrath (<<a href="mailto:Stefan.Blumentrath@nina.no" target="_blank">Stefan.Blumentrath@nina.no</a>>) escribió:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="NO-BOK">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Hi,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Personally, I tried being active on StackExchange. However, even though I do like to support colleagues using GRASS and the project in general, the GIS SE system somehow put me off.
I just did not like the attitude there and would myself not even think about asking questions there...<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">That said, GitHub discussions can be different. But I still would very much prefer the mentioned option to “modernize” the ML system.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I also think that if people could register at OSGeo (and MLs) with other accounts (Github, Google, …) that could lower entrance barriers. But that is a different, and probably more complicated
(?) issue…<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Cheers<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Stefan<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> grass-dev <<a href="mailto:grass-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">grass-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Vaclav Petras<br>
<b>Sent:</b> onsdag 10. februar 2021 04:10<br>
<b>To:</b> Markus Neteler <<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org" target="_blank">neteler@osgeo.org</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> GRASS developers list <<a href="mailto:grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [GRASS-dev] Should we use GitHub Discussions?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:59 PM Markus Neteler <<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org" target="_blank">neteler@osgeo.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-color:currentcolor currentcolor currentcolor rgb(204,204,204);border-style:none none none solid;border-width:medium medium medium 1pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:50 PM Vaclav Petras <<a href="mailto:wenzeslaus@gmail.com" target="_blank">wenzeslaus@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:01 AM Markus Neteler <<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org" target="_blank">neteler@osgeo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
> If we had a presence on StackExchange like QGIS has, we wouldn't be having a discussion about GitHub Discussions in the first place.<br>
<br>
Try this:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgis.stackexchange.com%2Fquestions%2Ftagged%2Fgrass&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd289d555eb8644f3d43b08d8cd716c87%7C6cef373021314901831055b3abf02c73%7C0%7C0%7C637485234341778088%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Dyz48Pe%2BEiOOvQUrep6ECt%2BSC3nqjdQMhE31keICWV8%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/grass</a><br>
--> 2,027 questions<u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I wish this would indicate a healthy community and I wish we would have one there. However, with a small sample from questions with recent activity, I see only a couple of users answering (2 or so; BTW thanks! you know who you are) and
from the 2027 questions tagged grass, there are "475 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers" [1]. This does not sound like what is in the original Nyall's email against QGIS using GitHub Discussions which says "there's LOTS of informed users answering
all the QGIS questions on gis.stackexchange." [2]. Perhaps even more telling is that no one except myself [3] mentioned GIS StackExchange in this discussion up until now.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">[1] <a href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgis.stackexchange.com%2Fquestions%2Ftagged%2Fgrass%3Ftab%3DUnanswered&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd289d555eb8644f3d43b08d8cd716c87%7C6cef373021314901831055b3abf02c73%7C0%7C0%7C637485234341778088%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=vXJOTBmVYkQUaQrCppWC%2BKOx2Zc0A%2FZBvpq%2FDHihlso%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">
https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/grass?tab=Unanswered</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">[2] <a href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.osgeo.org%2Fpipermail%2Fqgis-psc%2F2021-February%2F009244.html&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd289d555eb8644f3d43b08d8cd716c87%7C6cef373021314901831055b3abf02c73%7C0%7C0%7C637485234341788080%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=6uw%2ByA0iOlGsHjIS4OwE%2BJTuak6D1akR6lNoc1b8l5o%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2021-February/009244.html</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">[3] <a href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.osgeo.org%2Fpipermail%2Fgrass-dev%2F2021-January%2F094867.html&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd289d555eb8644f3d43b08d8cd716c87%7C6cef373021314901831055b3abf02c73%7C0%7C0%7C637485234341788080%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=bT8voloK2cCwwcXKGe78qt7awV8nLB4JeR0wjnK3HIg%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2021-January/094867.html</a> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
grass-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>