<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/27/2022 1:58 PM, Vaclav Petras
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CABo5uVs+rodtTurGeuan8aQofdkzosyHuDP+-teFQBjAsscUwQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at
23:38, Brad ReDacted <<a href="mailto:brad.redacted@outlook.com" moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">brad.redacted@outlook.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Is there any objection to adding yet another dependency?<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>To keep this moving, I think there are no objections to
adding security if the new dependency is optional. Optional
dependencies and maintainable code is generally a good start
to get something accepted.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It can be made optional. Probably for the best until Windows and
MacOS have native solutions.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Best Regards,
-Brad</pre>
</body>
</html>