<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Madi’s suggestion makes sense to me. I suppose that the wording of #2 could be modified to allow for the case where all members have already voted with no dissenting comments, if we think a rush situation might come up. I.e. instead of just increasing 4 days to 7 days, it could be worded as a default 7 days if comments are still being exchanged and votes coming in, but less time if everyone has voted without issue.<div><br><div><div>On Apr 6, 2014, at 07:48 , Margherita Di Leo <<a href="mailto:diregola@gmail.com">diregola@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Markus Neteler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org" target="_blank">neteler@osgeo.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">PSC;<br>
<br>
since the voting discussion is scattered around in various email<br>
threads, I start a new one to separate it from ongoing motions. Please<br>
re-express your comments as answer to this email.<br>
<br>
RFC3: PSC Voting Procedures<br>
<a href="http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/rfc3_psc.html" target="_blank">http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/rfc3_psc.html</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I fully support this proposal. My only concern raises about "business day" definition. PSC members are from all over the world and it might happen to be public holidays in some countries and working days in some else. I'd propose to change this sentence:</div>
<div><br></div><div>"<span style="font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;">Proposals are available for review for at least four business days" </span></div><div><br>into:<br>
</div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;">"Proposals are available for review for at least seven days"</span></div></div><br>Would this be OK?</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks,</div><div class="gmail_extra">Madi<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div><font color="#666666">Best regards,</font></div><div><font color="#666666"><br>
</font></div><div><font color="#666666">Dr. Margherita DI LEO </font></div><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:arial;font-size:small">Scientific / technical project officer</span><br></div><div><font color="#666666"><br>
</font></div><div><font color="#666666">European Commission - DG JRC </font></div><div><font color="#666666">Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)</font></div><div><font color="#666666">Via Fermi, 2749</font></div>
<div><font color="#666666">I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261</font></div><div><font color="#666666"> </font></div><div><font color="#666666">Tel. +39 0332 78 3600 </font></div><div><font color="#666666"><a href="mailto:margherita.di-leo@jrc.ec.europa.eu" target="_blank">margherita.di-leo@jrc.ec.europa.eu</a></font></div>
<div><font color="#666666"><br></font></div><div><font color="#666666">Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.</font></div>
</div>
</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>grass-psc mailing list<br><a href="mailto:grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org">grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>