<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2020-12-13 23:12, Veronica Andreo
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAAMki4GLc-eKzOgxH8gMZZb6qLkJPddiOkxA92rKsC0BCxGJfw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi everyone, <br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El dom, 13 dic 2020 a las
21:19, Moritz Lennert (<<a
href="mailto:mlennert@club.worldonline.be" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">mlennert@club.worldonline.be</a>>)
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
Am 13. Dezember 2020 20:36:05 MEZ schrieb Markus Neteler
<<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">neteler@osgeo.org</a>>:<br>
>On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM Hernán De Angelis<br>
><<a href="mailto:variablestarlight@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">variablestarlight@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi again,<br>
>><br>
>> In the wiki, eligible voters are defined as those
with svn access. This is perhaps outdated?<br>
><br>
>Yes, that's definitely outdated.<br>
><br>
>> In 2020 it should perhaps be those who can merge a
pull request in GitHub? Or should we choose another
definition?<br>
<br>
Only merge rights (i.e. write access to the grass
repository) seems very restrictive in current github PR
times.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Fully agreed! Last time, all of us in the contributors
and contributors_extra files were given voting rights. We
could also consider those in translators.csv. I don't
remember if they were considered last time. I believe they
were not.<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
>I believe that we should also recognize other
contributions<br>
>(documentation, translation etc).<br>
<br>
How to define this, though. In my eyes we should be as
inclusive as reasonable.<br>
<br>
Maybe we could say:<br>
<br>
- All people with write access to any of the GRASS GIS
repositories (i.e for example also including add-ons and
website).<br>
- All people that have already posted a pull request to
github (possibly only those PR that have been merged)<br>
- All people that have contributed to Transifex.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>+1!</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>+1 to this too</p>
<p>A couple of related questions:</p>
<p>1. is there any easily accessible/searchable list over people who
have the right to vote? How it is supposed the CRO will check
this?</p>
<p>2. Now that we are talking about lists of names, at least in EU
we have to follow GDPR. We should add somewhere a note stating
that names are going to be stored and shown, and also describing
how. Perhaps this is already considered?</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>/H.<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>