<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>+1 for proposal #2: "GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in the same<br/>
way by the community as possible new candidates"</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div>Peter</div>
<div> </div>
<div class="signature"><peter.loewe@gmx.de></div>
<div>
<div>
<div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 23. Dezember 2020 um 08:19 Uhr<br/>
<b>Von:</b> "Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS GIS election 2020" <variablestarlight@gmail.com><br/>
<b>An:</b> "GRASS-PSC" <grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org><br/>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS GIS Elections 2020] Current members of the PSC willing to stand up for reelection?</div>
<div name="quoted-content">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2020-12-22 17:43, Michael Barton wrote:</div>
<blockquote>I have no issue with either proposal. I did not respond because I never saw a notification, even though I was looking for it.
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</blockquote>
<p>If I counted correctly, it seems then that at this point we will need one more PSC vote to approve proposal #2.</p>
<p>"GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in the same<br/>
way by the community as possible new candidates"</p>
<p>Anyone?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hernán (CRO)</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div>On Dec 22, 2020, at 6:48 AM, Markus Neteler <<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org" onclick="parent.window.location.href='mailto:neteler@osgeo.org'; return false;" target="_blank">neteler@osgeo.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<div>
<div>On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:34 PM Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS<br/>
GIS election 2020 <<a href="mailto:variablestarlight@gmail.com" onclick="parent.window.location.href='mailto:variablestarlight@gmail.com'; return false;" target="_blank">variablestarlight@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
<blockquote>On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
<blockquote>On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert</blockquote>
</blockquote>
...
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>But I agree with Hernán that we should have discussed this earlier.</blockquote>
Still it is not too late, say, "nothing lost".</blockquote>
<br/>
Marcus, what do you say on this?</blockquote>
<br/>
What I tried to say is that we might quickly modify our procedure to<br/>
Helli's suggestion as no PSC member had answered yet (hence, no<br/>
conflict arises so far).<br/>
<blockquote>What do other PSC members say? Shall<br/>
the PSC make a consensus on these proposals? In that case it would be<br/>
nice to have the matter resolved rather sooner than later.</blockquote>
<br/>
Definitely.<br/>
<br/>
@PSC: do you agree to change our procedure to<br/>
<br/>
"GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in the same<br/>
way by the community as possible new candidates"<br/>
<br/>
?<br/>
<br/>
Markus<br/>
_______________________________________________<br/>
grass-psc mailing list<br/>
<a href="mailto:grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org" onclick="parent.window.location.href='mailto:grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org'; return false;" target="_blank">grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br/>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!LXnc6cuCYMYT1IyIMAPQJ9fyf7msoxybE0_ekbTQIbJHMx8vCcfIl-5hyOavwxwa7AcwZNw$" target="_blank">https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!LXnc6cuCYMYT1IyIMAPQJ9fyf7msoxybE0_ekbTQIbJHMx8vCcfIl-5hyOavwxwa7AcwZNw$</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>