<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Thanks Anna and Vaclav for your comments.<br>
<br>
I believe the principles used to make the list are neat and sound. I
do not see the need to complicate things more in the future.<br>
<br>
Anna, I agree, someone that may be contributed a little long ago may
not be interested or involved in the project today. How large the
proportion was? I do not know for sure but from the numbers I
estimate it in the order of 60, or 40% of the list.<br>
<br>
Vaclav, I agree, although the list is not secret its only
appropriate to talk publicly in terms of aggregates. Also all votes
are encrypted: neither the CRO nor anyone can see who voted for
whom.<br>
<br>
As I wrote before, I see no major problems. My thoughts about
improvements are mostly within the CRO role, like making
communication more clear on how to opt out or the times for start of
the election, etc.<br>
<br>
We now have a new PSC full with competent and energic people. As
Vero worte, let's keep growing GRASS !<br>
<br>
All good :-)<br>
<br>
Hernán<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Den 2024-10-30 kl. 15:41, skrev Vaclav
Petras:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CABo5uVtn7qs6-Zj0QRC-J0gJE=iVncFY32DO_pVzGezQXFKsBg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I'm also happy with the elections and grateful to all who
made it happen, especially Hernán, but Vero, those who
nominated, the candidates, and voters too. However, I do have
things I would like to be different next time, so I'm happy to
keep discussing. As far as the eligible voters:</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at
09:45, Anna Petrášová via grass-psc <<a
href="mailto:grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Oct 30, 2024
at 6:31 AM Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS GIS
election 2024 via grass-psc <<a
href="mailto:grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
2) The best part is that we had a list of voters
right at the start, <br>
which Vero had compiled in good time using very
clear criteria for who <br>
was eligible.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The criteria we set up - contribution to a grass
repo - will necessarily include people who have no
motivation to vote, they contributed either a long
time ago, just once, they are not familiar with the
community etc. So we can't expect all these
contributors to vote. How large portion would fall
into this group, I don't know.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Importantly, the contributions are not from all history.
Vero please correct me if I'm wrong, but they are only since
the last PSC election. Or the last two? I remember the
discussion about that, but not the exact result. Anyway,
this is trying to exclude the inactive contributors, but it
does include the one-time contributors which is to include
the non-frequent contributors.</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>That said, I don't think we have a better way to
create the voters list unless we go with something
much more complicated (like charter memebers). Is
the list of people who voted available? It could be
interesting to analyze it.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think there might be different expectations on what is
private besides who you voted for. However, CRO has the
information already and doing aggregate statistics or
statements to share publicly or privately with PSC is within
expected parameters I would say.</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>