[GRASS-user] PSC: Input Requested

[Dylan Beaudette]

Eric,

Sure, I appreciate being nominated for the PSC. 

If people are not upset by the fact that I would setup the poll on our local 
machine, then I have no problem staying in.

Cheers,

Dylan

On Thursday 03 August 2006 10:46, Patton, Eric wrote:
> That sounds like a pretty efficient way of going about it. I like it. But I
> also think it would be good to have you on the PSC - (+1 for me).
>
> ~ Eric.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dylan Beaudette
> To: grassuser at grass.itc.it
> Cc: Sampson, David; Patton, Eric; pmarc
> Sent: 8/3/2006 2:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] PSC: Input Requested
>
> An alternative:
>
> I can forfeit my nomination, and setup  poll on our labs website. Since
> the
> framework for such a thing is already in place it would be possible to
> do
> anonymous voting via a web browser.
>
> this might make it simpler to keep track of who is voting for whom.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>  Dylan
>
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 10:30, Sampson, David wrote:
> > IMHO managing votes on the list is more complicated than I originaly
> > thought... But if that's what the community wants that's cool... As
>
> long
>
> > as the option is not choosen because people think it's the EASIEST
> > way...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patton, Eric
> > Sent: August 3, 2006 13:07
> > To: Sampson, David; 'pmarc '; 'grassuser at grass.itc.it '
> > Subject: RE: [GRASS-user] PSC: Input Requested
> >
> > I think Brad's post on this was quite succinct; I agree to waiting a
> > couple of weeks to get nominees like Hamish on board; after that, move
> > to voting. I think the mailing list is an ok medium for voting for
>
> these
>
> > issues, so long as someone is paying attention and collating the
> > results.
> >
> > ~ Eric.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: grassuser-bounces at grass.itc.it
> > To: pmarc; grassuser at grass.itc.it
> > Sent: 8/3/2006 12:43 PM
> > Subject: RE: [GRASS-user] PSC: Input Requested
> >
> > Pretty Much......
> >
> > The only potential modification is to have 2 more weeks for nominees
> > that may be on vacation... But on the flip side this is not a etched
>
> in
>
> > stone PSC, more people can come in on the process later if they bring
>
> a
>
> > particular view point.
> >
> > Any other thoughts out there?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: grassuser-bounces at grass.itc.it
> > [mailto:grassuser-bounces at grass.itc.it] On Behalf Of pmarc
> > Sent: August 3, 2006 12:29
> > To: GRASS
> > Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] PSC: Input Requested
> >
> > 2006/8/3, Sampson, David <dsampson at nrcan.gc.ca>:
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > *PLEASE RESPOND TO USERS LIST*
> > >
> > > If that is enough time for feedback then we can progress forward.
> >
> > I vote for moving on.
> >
> > take the current nominees list, allow two more weeks for that, then
> > start votes for two weeks - is that a summary of the process?
> >
> > cheers.
> > --
> > Paulo Marcondes = PU1/PU2PIX
> > -22.915 -42.229 = GG87vc (http://www.amsat.org/cgi-bin/gridconv)
> > Debian GNU/Linux = http://rj.debianbrasil.org = http://www.debian.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > grassuser mailing list
> > grassuser at grass.itc.it
> > http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > grassuser mailing list
> > grassuser at grass.itc.it
> > http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > grassuser mailing list
> > grassuser at grass.itc.it
> > http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser

-- 
Dylan Beaudette
Soils and Biogeochemistry Graduate Group
University of California at Davis
530.754.7341