[GRASSLIST:10288] Re: ps.map resolution

[Glynn Clements]

Tom Russo wrote:

> Back in October there was a discussion of how ps.map had a hard coded 
> setting of 75DPI for its output, and a bit of a discussion of fixing that.
> 
> I just spent a bunch of time trying to make postscript map files of some
> fairly high-quality map scans, only to have them come out looking blotchy.  
> Only just now did I remember this discussion and look it up in my mail archives.
> 
> Has there been any more thought about how to do away with this hard-coded 
> limit in ps.map?  The temporary solution is to rebuild ps.map with a 
> different, higher hardcoded resolution, which is icky, to say the least (but 
> easy, and that's what I did).

Sorry, I didn't realise it was still there. The latest CVS version no
longer downsamples raster maps.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>