On 02/24/01, at 11:12 AM, "Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps.net> said:

>I argued a while back that we should consider ditching the whole
>monitor/module separation for display since it was designed to overcome the
>widely varying display architectures way back when.  Since X is pretty much
>the standard for unix boxen, we could move to having an interface with a much
>higher level of functionality.  Actually, upon a little research, I think Tk
>could be used for some windowing system independence (NVIZ already does,
>though isn't the best UI).  Anyway, I think a lot could be done in this area.

The limitation that I have encountered with the present system is the size of rendered images. Both a standard GRASS monitor and an NVIZ window are effectively limited to the size of the physical display. NVIZ produces beautiful 3D images, but even though I might have a raster region size of 2000 x 3000 pixels, for example, I cannot produce a rendered image anywhere near that size, simply because it will not fit on my screen. 

Barring a major architectural change, if there existed a way to save rendered images directly as files, then for me that would be an acceptable solution.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Carl Brown cbsled@ncia.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
 We are convinced by things that show internal
 complexity, that show the traces of an interesting
 evolution. Those signs tell us that we might be
 rewarded if we accord it our trust. An important
 aspect of design is the degree to which the object
 involves you in its own completion.
   -- Brian Eno, rock musician and avant-garde artist
       on design


