<DIV>Hi,</DIV>
<DIV>the downloaded opendwg (for GRASS v.in.dwg to work) is to be compiled with GRASS6.*.</DIV>
<DIV>This is not fair game for most eager GIS users who shift from other commercial packages.</DIV>
<DIV>Even importing E00 files of ARC-INFO also pose a problem.</DIV>
<DIV>Compilation again needs some C and Linux knowledge..</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If these files can come similar to dependency RPMs like tcl, tk,gdal etc it would be wonderful.<BR>Ravi Kumar<BR><B><I>Markus Neteler <neteler@itc.it></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:04:48AM +0200, Adrián J. Montero Calvo wrote:<BR>> Hello, I've downloaded opendwg, but i don't want to compile all grass 6.0. Can anybody send me a copy of v.in.dwg and v.in.dwg30 compiled? Otherwise, is it posible to compile only these modules? Thanks.<BR><BR>There are two options:<BR>- if the opendwg libs are only statically distributed (.a extension),<BR>the v.in.dwg cannot be distributed (legally)<BR>- if the opendwg libs are also distributed as dynamic libraries <BR>we can also distribute v.in.dwg. I didn't check for a long time,<BR>two years ago only the static opendwg library was available.<BR><BR>What is the current state?<BR><BR>Markus<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com