<div id="RTEContent">Hi Kenneth,<br> <br> I am running GRASS on two boxes: One has an AMD-64 2800 processor with 2GB of RAM and a HD of 160 GB; the other one is a laptop with a P-4 @ 1.7 with 560 MB of RAM. I did compile GRASS on 64 bit mode as well as other GRASS related software (e.g. R, PostgreSQL, etc) and I've noticed a big difference when analyzing data. I assume you're considering building your own which I also think is the best way to go.<br> <br> HTH,<br> <br> Jaime<br><br><b><i>Kenneth Cabrera <krcabrer@epm.net.co></i></b> escribió:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> Hi GRASS users:<br><br>In your opinion and experience, which hardware configuration<br>is the best to run GRASS over LINUX ?<br><br>With "best" I mean best performance,<br>and also cheapest. (about U$ 2.000 the whole basic system:<br>mother board+CPUs+RAM+HD)<br><br>By the way, which LINUX distribution is th!
e best
to<br>run GRASS with huge data base?<br>and in combination with what kind of (cheap) hardware?<br><br>Thank you very much for your help.<br><br>Kenneth<br><br>Happy Holydays!!<br><br>begin:vcard<br>fn:Kenneth Cabrera<br>n:Cabrera;Kenneth <br>adr;quoted-printable:;;;Medell=C3=ADn;Antioquia;00000;Colombia<br>email;internet:krcabrer@epm.net.co<br>tel;cell:315 504 9339<br>version:2.1<br>end:vcard<br><br></blockquote><br></div><p>__________________________________________________<br>Correo Yahoo!<br>Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! <br>Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/