<div dir="ltr">Okay, I did find verification that this doesn't work in r.resamp.stats:<br><br><i>[1] The min and max aggregates can't use weights, so -w has no effect
for those.</i><br><br>From <a href="http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_raster_semantics">http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_raster_semantics</a> - a good read for anyone working with raster data.<br><br>-Jamie<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Jamie Adams <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jaadfoo@gmail.com">jaadfoo@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr">Hello all,<br><br>When I use r.resamp.stats to resample a grid of 0s & 1s using the maximum option and the -w flag, it doesn't seem to consider the "edge" pixels that overlap. It returns the same result as without the -w flag. I've gotten around this by using the default method and setting anything > 0 to 1.<br>
<br>Any reason for this behavior, other than being a bug? <br><br>-Jamie<br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>