I think 7 is fine. My current approach is working well enough. <br><br>Thanks!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Markus Neteler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:neteler@osgeo.org">neteler@osgeo.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Glynn Clements<br>
<<a href="mailto:glynn@gclements.plus.com">glynn@gclements.plus.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Glynn Clements wrote:<br>
...<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> Implemented in r33888 (in 7.0).<br>
><br>
> The aforementioned comment in the Wiki still stands. min/max aren't<br>
> actually weighted, so the behaviour of those aggregates with a<br>
> perfectly aligned grid is "unstable" (i.e. the exact result may depend<br>
> upon miniscule rounding errors) even when -w is used.<br>
<br>
</div>Jamie,<br>
<br>
do you want need this in 6.4 (hence, backport)? Or are you fine<br>
with GRASS 7? According to Glynn it's a slightly incompatible<br>
change which isn't 100% in line with our backport policy.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Markus<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>