<div>Hi Glynn, sorry my delay on answer.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>So under windows we are really limitted to 2Gb </div>
<div>independent of compile using LFS flag? :-(</div>
<div>Are there plans to by pass this!?</div>
<div>I hope windows users could also be favoured</div>
<div>of GRASS for work with large maps on near future.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>bests</div>
<div> </div>
<div>milton<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">2010/1/19 Glynn Clements <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:glynn@gclements.plus.com">glynn@gclements.plus.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im"><br>Milton Cezar Ribeiro wrote:<br><br>> I am using r.series to join several large raster maps, but<br>> the south part of my map is completely empty, and<br>> whem I try r.what I get a error message "can't read".<br>
><br>> I was wondering if it is a problem with LFS (large file system)<br>> flag. I compiled grass 6.4.0svn two weeks ago using<br>> OSGeo4W/Msys under Vista, in a dell/64bit computer with<br>> 6G ram. Any help are welcome.<br>
<br></div>LFS currently doesn't work on Windows.<br><font color="#888888"><br>--<br>Glynn Clements <<a href="mailto:glynn@gclements.plus.com">glynn@gclements.plus.com</a>><br></font></blockquote></div><br>