<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Rich Shepard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rshepard@appl-ecosys.com">rshepard@appl-ecosys.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Margherita Di Leo wrote:<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Actually, I fear that nature doesn't really care about politic boundaries<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
No, but national data sets do.<br>
<br>
The basin to the west of the top-most white area also does not include the<br>
mouth of the main stem shown, but it's colored as a basin. Further to the<br>
southwest, is another white, non-basin that should be included.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If I understand, the blue lines are the "natural" rivers, which may differ from the calculated stream network. Maybe could be useful to display the calculated stream network in order to understand the logic that the algorithm may have followed creating those basins.</div>
<div>Further, I would also give a try using r.stream.basins.</div><div><br></div><div>madi</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Perhaps I need to play more with the r.watershed threshold value.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Rich<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
grass-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:grass-user@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">grass-user@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/grass-user</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Ing. Margherita Di Leo, Ph.D.<br>