<html style="direction: ltr;">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<style type="text/css">body p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; } </style>
</head>
<body bidimailui-charset-is-forced="true" style="direction: ltr;"
text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/17/2017 10:30 AM, Markus Metz
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG+h=FEjZpmWotwCsi+5OR_MyX+LJRn1abkuPiXhe2FmiqU6NQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Micha Silver <<a
href="mailto:tsvibar@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">tsvibar@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hello<br>
><br>
> On 11/16/2017 11:51 PM, Giuseppe Amatulli wrote:<br>
><br>
<br>
> I think it was already mentioned in this thread: the
threshold=0.5 is certainly wrong. The threshold value is
*number of pixels* for minimum basin size. Usually it would
be in the thousands. With your region size of 11 billion you
probably want a threshold of tens of thousands.<br>
<br>
</div>
As Giuseppe explained previously, accumulation has been
rescaled to square kilometers, therefore the threshold is ok
(still a bit small, but not nonsense).<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Ah, I missed that, thanks<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG+h=FEjZpmWotwCsi+5OR_MyX+LJRn1abkuPiXhe2FmiqU6NQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">Markus M<br>
<div>
<div>><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Micha Silver
Ben Gurion Univ.
Sde Boker, Remote Sensing Lab
cell: +972-523-665918</pre>
</body>
</html>