<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Cameron,<div>Good point, added the following:</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; font-size: 13px; ">It is important to note that future contributors may cause a change in this approach. Participants from other geographic areas will be accomodated and may cause a shift to online meetings or shifts to other geographical locations. Furthermore, it is hoped that as the OSSIM community grows we will be able to support annual get togethers.</span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana" size="3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana" size="3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px;">I'll report back once the header modifications have been accomplished.</span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana" size="3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px;"><br></span></font></div><div>Mark</div><div><br><div><div>On Mar 31, 2009, at 3:53 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>Thanks Mark,<br>All I'd add are a few caveats which allow you to change your processes further down the track if you attract developers from another geographic location.<br><br>Eg: "Typically meetings will be held at Last Stand in downtown Melbourne Florida, but may be located elsewhere, or moved elsewhere or onto teleconference or similar, as agreed by participants."<br><br>Mark Lucas wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Cameron and Jody,<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Yes, thanks for the inputs. I've made another pass through the related wiki pages. Expanded on Cameron's suggestions here:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/ossim/wiki/ossimgovernance">http://trac.osgeo.org/ossim/wiki/ossimgovernance</a><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">We'll plan on proceeding with the header modifications later this week after coordination with the OSSIM mailing list.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Mark<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">On Mar 30, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Thanks Mark, yes I believe such a header is fine.<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">The issue I raised was to do with decision making transparency. Has that been resolved?<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Cameron Shorter wrote:<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Face to face meetings are more effective than email lists for working out project issues.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">The only downside is that they don't automatically generate logs of discussions like email lists and IRC channels.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">What I suggest is:<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">* Write down your process for meetings, which would probably be something like:<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">** Send meeting request, xx number of days before meeting, allowing interested parties to participate.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">** Meet face to face<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">** Describe voting process (1 member = 1 vote)<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">** Document decisions in wiki/email list/ ...<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">The documented decisions are the key part that you will reference in order to prove an effective PSC.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Is this achievable?<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Jody Garnett wrote:<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">The LGPL license has a sample header file which is a little bit longer<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">than that; but what you describe sounds fine.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Indeed you email here addresses the two issues initially raised:<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">- header file indicating which license the source code is made available under<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">- license included<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">There was also some questions about process / visibility. Is their a<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">revised document for us to review?<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Jody<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Mark Lucas <<a href="mailto:mlucas17@mac.com">mlucas17@mac.com</a>> wrote:<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">We have written a script and test plan to modify 1308 header files in the<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">ossim baseline adding the following lines at the beginning of the file:<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">// The OSSIM distribution is licensed under LGPL<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">// See the LICENSE.txt in the ossim folder for details<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">//<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">We have placed this recommendation on the OSSIM mailing list and have not<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">received any objections from the OSSIM community.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Before making the change we would like some feedback from the incubation<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">committee that this will address the previously raised comments.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Are there any additional concerns or actions required to complete the<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">incubation process?<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Mark<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Incubator mailing list<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:Incubator@lists.osgeo.org">Incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator</a><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">-- <br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Cameron Shorter<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Geospatial Systems Architect<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Think Globally, Fix Locally<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://www.lisasoft.com">http://www.lisasoft.com</a><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Incubator mailing list<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:Incubator@lists.osgeo.org">Incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator</a><br></blockquote><br><br>-- <br>Cameron Shorter<br>Geospatial Systems Architect<br>Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050<br>Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254<br><br>Think Globally, Fix Locally<br>Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source<br><a href="http://www.lisasoft.com">http://www.lisasoft.com</a><br><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>