<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><blockquote type="cite">he incubation committee will in future have to address maintenance of</blockquote>graduated projects. (I bring this topic up every few months. One day<br>someone will hopefully pick it up and discuss these ideas here).</div></blockquote><br></div><div>Hi Arnulf:</div><div><br></div><div>Sounds like we have a similar idea of what needs to be done over the next little while. If the incubation committee is going to play a role for graduated projects perhaps it should be called the "project" committee. Do you know if it is within our mandate to do this?</div><div><br></div><div>If so we could ask that MapBuilder be removed from the website; it is marked as retired in its website (and <a href="http://mapbuilder.net">mapbuilder.net</a> has taken over google rankings) but there is no indication on the website what is going on.</div><div><br></div><div>In our wiki the previous incubation documents are marked as "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; ">for historical purposes, and are no longer actively maintained". This would actually be a point in favour of projects doing the work on their wiki or source code tree. For GeoTools we moved the review into our source code tree so it can be actively maintained.</span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="sans-serif" size="3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="sans-serif" size="3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Jody</span></font></div></body></html>