<div>
            <div>
                <span>We could also change the incubation committee mandate; call it the "project committee" and act for the board in this capacity. I would prefer we stay focused on supporting new projects; but that activity has been light recently due to lack of progress.<br>
                </span>
                <span><br>--&nbsp;<br>Jody Garnett<br><br></span>
                
                <p style="color: #a0a0a0;">On Thursday, 9 June 2011 at 7:54 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:</p>
                <blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
                    <span><div><div><div>
            <div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span><div><div>Making this part of the annual report is a good idea.<br><br>On a related issue: Some time ago I suggested to annually revisit<br>incubated projects and check their status. IncCom at that time believed<br>that this would not be their task. If not who is? On our web site we<br>prominently advertize that we support highest quality projects but after<br>incubation has passed there is no formal process that would justify this.<br></div></div></span></div></blockquote><div>My understanding is those representatives are "officers" reporting to the board</div><div>and can report to the board on whatever schedule the board sets.</div><div><br></div><div>Jody</div>
            </div>
        </div></div></div></span>
                
                
                
                
                </blockquote>
                
                <div>
                    <br>
                </div>
            </div>
        </div>