<div>
Cameron I have had some luck untangle the process section.
</div><div><br></div><div>The section was confusing as it mixed up tangible work that could be crossed off; with our hopes and goals for what those processes would accomplish.</div><div><br></div><div>It could be that we should set up an IRC meeting in our timezone to go over this in Dec.</div><div>-- <br>Jody Garnett<br><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Saturday, 3 December 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div>
<div>
Hi Cameron:
</div><div><br></div><div>Rather than going back and forth on this topic I have had a go at being helpful.</div><div><br></div><div>Please review: <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist</a></div><div><br></div><div>I have split out a "Community" section with the following:</div><div>- Board</div><div>- Marketing</div><div>- Projects</div><div>- SAC</div><div><br></div><div>And noted what information each group has requested; with appropriate links for more information. If you would like to add the OSGeo Live project to that list please go ahead.</div><div><br></div><div>Much of this information is already requested by our project status template (example for the board or for SAC). I still figure this section earns its keep as it highlights where that information is going.</div>
<div><div><br></div><div>Please let me know what you think? I expect this is a positive way forward that will keep us from bashing heads :-)</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div>Jody Garnett<br><div><br></div></div>
</div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>