<div>
Perhaps call it "Sanity Check" so everyone can be equally annoyed :-) These are supposed to be the basics of making a project "open source" after all…</div><div><br></div><div>In that spirit:</div><div>- "Open Source"</div><div>- "Distribution" (since this is really a check on what is being distributed)</div><div>- "Review"</div><div>- "Artefact review"</div>
<div><div>- "Formal Review"</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Jody Garnett<br></div><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Sunday, 15 January 2012 at 8:57 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div><div>On 14/01/12 11:00, Arnulf Christl wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>On 01/13/2012 06:05 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>On 12/01/12 23:46, Daniel Morissette wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>I agree that we should avoid implying that we had a formal</div><div>legal/lawyer review. Perhaps the "Legal" section could be named</div><div>"Intellectual Property and License"?</div></div></blockquote><div>Good idea, I've updated the title in the wiki with "Intellectual</div><div>Property and License"</div></div></blockquote><div>2Ct sideways: ...if at all possible I would try to avoid using the term</div><div>"Intellectual Property" in official statements because it is a malicious</div><div>Meme. Simply by using it we subscribe to the concept. But Open Source</div><div>does not function on "intellectual property" (if I ever have to use it,</div><div>I at least put it in quotes).</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Arnulf</div></div></blockquote><div>This section about checking license, patents, copyright, trademark is </div><div>becoming tricky to title.</div><div>"Legal" has been rejected, as it implies a lawyer has been involved. (We </div><div>don't have budget for lawyers).</div><div><br></div><div>"Intellectual Property" is now being suggested against, as it goes </div><div>against of free-loving philosophy.</div><div><br></div><div>Arnulf, would you care to suggest an alternative heading?</div><div>Would you be happy with quotes inserted as:</div><div> License and "Intellectual Property"</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist#Intellectual_Property_and_LicenseLicense">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist#Intellectual_Property_and_LicenseLicense</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Cameron Shorter</div><div>Geospatial Solutions Manager</div><div>Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050</div><div>Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254</div><div><br></div><div>Think Globally, Fix Locally</div><div>Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source</div><div><a href="http://www.lisasoft.com">http://www.lisasoft.com</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________</div><div>Incubator mailing list</div><div><a href="mailto:Incubator@lists.osgeo.org">Incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a></div><div><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator</a></div></div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>