<div><span style="font-size: 14px;">Thank you for the update on Rasdaman :D</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 14px;">I have filled in that page, and tried to make it a bit more clear how projects are doing in incubation:</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 14px;">- </span>http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Incubation_Committee#Progress_in_the_incubator
</div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-size: 14px;">It looks like I better reach out to individual mentors off list and check in with project status.</span></div><div>-- </div><div><div>Jody Garnett<br></div><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Sunday, 23 June 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: 14px;">Thanks!</span>
</div><div><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 14px;">I was trying to find links from the incubator wiki (</span><a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Incubation_Committee">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Incubation_Committee</a>). Currently this page just links to the "status" document for Rasdaman.</div>
<div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Jody Garnett<br></div><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 12:15 PM, Bruce Bannerman wrote:</p><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<span><div><div>
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.17114" name="GENERATOR">
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<div><font size="2">Hi Jody,<br><br>_Rasdaman Incubation Status Update_<br><br>The
Rasdaman Incubation checklist is being maintained at [1].<br><br>My general
observations on the project for the last period are:</font></div>
<ul>
<li><font size="2">Overall, the project appears to be in good shape, with 26 new
user registrations this month alone.</font></li>
<li><font size="2">Project activity has increased with a marked increase in
email traffic on the developer and user lists.</font></li>
<li><font size="2">Considerable activity is occuring related to documenting and
fine tuning of software release processes, including tying these to processes
relating to the use of git.</font></li>
<li><font size="2">Work is underway to support git branching with a view towards
maintained releases.</font></li>
<li><font size="2">Work is under way to support regression testing for
OGC compliance e.g. WCPS and WCS. </font></li>
<li><font size="2">Work is underway to improve the testing
framework.</font></li>
<li><font size="2">Rasdaman's CRS name resolver has been deployed as OGC's
official CRS name resolver.</font></li>
<li><font size="2">I'm starting to see future planning activities being
presented to the Rasdaman Community for comment. This is good to
see.</font></li>
<li><font size="2">We still don't have documented processes describing a range
of factors, however I anticipate that these will come in time. Some examples
are:</font></li>
<ul>
<li><font size="2">Project Governance and processes</font></li>
<li><font size="2">Who is on the Project Steering Committee? How are PSC
members (s)elected, replaced etc? What are the responsibilities of the
PSC?</font></li>
<li><font size="2">What Code review is expected for new contributions? Who
does this review?</font></li>
<li><font size="2">How are Commiters selected? What are their
responsibilities? How is commit status reviewed?</font></li></ul>
<li><font size="2">The project has a reasonably well defined roadmap [2]. What
I'm not clear on yet is e.g.:</font></li>
<ul>
<li><font size="2">How was this roadmap has been defined?</font></li>
<li><font size="2">What community review process is used to arrive at the
roadmap?</font></li>
<li><font size="2">How were relative priorities determined?</font></li>
<li><font size="2">How are new priorities balanced against existing
priorities?</font></li></ul></ul><font size="2">
<div><br><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff">Bruce</font><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>[1] <a href="http://www.rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeoIncubationChecklist">http://www.rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeoIncubationChecklist</a><br></div>
</font><div><font size="2"></font><font size="2"><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff"></font></font> </div>
<div><font size="2"><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff">[2] <a href="http://www.rasdaman.org/roadmap">http://www.rasdaman.org/roadmap</a> </font></font></div><font size="2">
</font><div><font size="2"><br><br><br><br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: Peter Baumann
[<a href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a>]<br>>
Sent: Thursday, 20 June 2013 8:21 AM<br>> To: Jody Garnett<br>> Cc:
<a href="mailto:incubator@lists.osgeo.org">incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a>; Bruce Bannerman<br>> Subject: Re: [Incubator]
status update for board<br>><br>> well, it's dull words on our OSGeo
page:<br>><br>><br>><br>> 2012-jul-22<br>><br>>
* Code provenance inspection has been
completed.<br>><br>> ...any link to this page missing
?<br>><br>> (BTW, see also: <a href="http://www.rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeoCodeProvenance">http://www.rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeoCodeProvenance</a>)<br>><br>>
cheers,<br>> Peter<br>><br>><br>><br>> On 06/20/2013 12:12 AM,
Jody Garnett wrote:<br>><br>><br>> It
could be that there is just no link to the review<br>> from the incubation
wiki? I would love to say something like<br>> 90% done :D<br>><br>>
--<br>> Jody
Garnett<br>> <br>><br>><br>>
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 4:31 AM, Peter
Baumann wrote:<br>><br>>
<br>>
Hi
Jody,<br>>
<br>>
that's
good to learn, I had thought provenance<br>> review for rasdaman is passsed
already.<br>>
@Bruce: I know you are abroad and
even more<br>> busy these days, do you see an opportunity for an email
chat<br>> on where we stand, what remaining issues there are from
your<br>> perspective?<br>>
<br>>
thanks,<br>>
Peter<br>>
<br>>
<br>>
<br>>
On
06/19/2013 08:41 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:<br>>
<br>><br>>
Looks like I should put together
a<br>> draft letter for the mailing list to review.<br>><br>>
We currently have the
following<br>> projects in incubation:<br>><br>>
*
gvSIG - we have a new project<br>> rep, status last updated in 2011, no
provenance review<br>>
*
Marble - status updated Nov<br>> 2012, no provenance review<br>>
*
MetaCRS - status updated in<br>> 2009, no provenance review (unclear if that
is applicable for<br>> the project?)<br>>
*
Opticks - status updated Nov<br>> 2012, no provenance review<br>>
*
pycsw - no status or provenance review<br>>
*
rasdaman - status updated July<br>> 2012, no provenance review<br>>
*
TEAM Engine - some contact on<br>> email, no status or provenance
review<br>>
*
ZOO-Project - no status or<br>> provenance review<br>><br>><br>>
--<br>>
Jody Garnett<br>>
<br>><br>><br>>
On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 at 10:55
AM,<br>> Jody Garnett wrote:<br>><br>>
<br>>
Well with bi-monthly meetings<br>>
falling by the wayside it has been very quiet around here.<br>><br>>
I have a couple of things to work
on:<br>>
- catch up on Trac<br>>
<<a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/query?status=new&status=assigned&">http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/query?status=new&status=assigned&</a><br>status=reopened&component=Incubator&order=priority><br>>
- Landon was interested in<br>>
mentoring a project<br>><br>>
And I would like to ask
mentors<br>> for an update on incubation progress. I will send an email
to<br>> the board on the status of incubation projects at the end of<br>>
the month. This is one of our responsibilities<br>> <<a href="http://www.osgeo.org/incubator">http://www.osgeo.org/incubator</a>>
as a committee (although no<br>> timeframe was given).<br>>
--<br>>
Jody Garnett<br>>
<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>>
<br>>
<br>>
_______________________________________________<br>>
Incubator mailing list<br>>
<a href="mailto:Incubator@lists.osgeo.org">Incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>>
<br>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator</a><br>>
<br>><br>><br>>
-- <br>>
Dr. Peter Baumann<br>>
- Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs<br>> University Bremen<br>>
<a href="http://www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann">www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann</a><br>>
mail: <a href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a><br>>
tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178<br>>
- Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)<br>>
<a href="http://www.rasdaman.com">www.rasdaman.com</a>, mail: <a href="mailto:baumann@rasdaman.com">baumann@rasdaman.com</a><br>>
tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax,<br>> mobile:
+49-173-5837882<br>>
"Si forte in alienas manus
oberraverit hec<br>> peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed
Deo<br>> commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec<br>>
preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)<br>>
<br>>
<br>>
<br>><br>><br>><br>>
--<br>> Dr. Peter Baumann<br>> - Professor of Computer Science,
Jacobs University Bremen<br>>
<a href="http://www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann">www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann</a><br>> mail:
<a href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a><br>> tel: +49-421-200-3178,
fax: +49-421-200-493178<br>> - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen
(HRB 26793)<br>> <a href="http://www.rasdaman.com">www.rasdaman.com</a>, mail:
<a href="mailto:baumann@rasdaman.com">baumann@rasdaman.com</a><br>> tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax:
0800-rasdafax, mobile:<br>> +49-173-5837882 "Si forte in alienas manus
oberraverit hec<br>> peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed
Deo<br>> commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec<br>>
preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD
1083)<br>><br>><br>> </font></div>
</div></div></span>
</div></blockquote><div>
<br>
</div>
</div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>