<div dir="ltr">aside: Going to do my best to leave this conversation on the board list, the GeoMapFish project is returned to us (as a community project to enter incubation that is fine), as long as it is a osgeo project I feel that it should report to the board like any other committee.<br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>--</div><div>Jody Garnett</div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 14:10, Bruce Bannerman <<a href="mailto:bruce.bannerman.osgeo@gmail.com">bruce.bannerman.osgeo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space">+1<div><br></div><div>Bruce</div><div><br><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 21 Nov 2019, at 07:52, Cameron Shorter <<a href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com" target="_blank">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div>
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p>Jody, I'd suggest that this should be managed at the level of the
OSGeo Incubation Committee rather than at the OSGeo Board.</p><p>As a Incubation Committee member, I'd suggest giving MapFish a
period of time (say 3 months?) to re-validate their incubation
status, and during that time have them remain as an incubated
project. We don't have a process yet for this, so we probably
should write the process as we go.<br>
</p>
<div>On 19/11/19 11:02 am, Jody Garnett
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Earlier this year we places several osgeo
projects that were not communicating (or no longer meeting
osgeo expectations) into the OSGeo community program.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>One project that asked for some more time was mapfish:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>* The <a href="http://mapfish.org/" target="_blank">mapfish.org</a><a href="http://www.mapfish.org/" target="_blank">http://www.mapfish.org/</a> website
uses the old logo and documents MapFish 2.2 released in
2016</div>
<div>* The osgeo project page was never filled in <a href="https://www.osgeo.org/projects/mapfish/" target="_blank">https://www.osgeo.org/projects/mapfish/</a> (1)<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The good news is that the the project is very much
alive, has a new GeoMapFish name, <a href="https://geomapfish.org/" target="_blank">website</a>, <a href="http://github.com/camptocamp/c2cgeoportal" target="_blank">code base</a>, and a new
development team (indeed I am not sure if any current
members took part in the incubation process).<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On the bright side Emmanuel and the MapFisk PSC
produced a page for the AGM (slide 59) which is great and
really improves communication.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My question though is simple - should we remove MapFish
as an OSGeo project, and invite GeoMapFish to apply to the
OSGeo Community program, or should we ask this PSC to
quick march this project through the incubation checklist
requirements to preserve continuity?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Emmanuel would you be able to attend the board meeting
to provide an update on this project? If you need help
setting up osgeo project page we are happy to do so on the
incubation email list.</div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>--</div>
<div>Jody Garnett</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>(1) Wishing to recommend mapfish today and
finding this page is what promoted this email</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
<a href="mailto:Board@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Board@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre cols="72">--
Cameron Shorter
Technology Demystifier
Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant
M +61 (0) 419 142 254</pre>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>Board mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Board@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Board@lists.osgeo.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Incubator mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Incubator@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator</a></blockquote></div>