[iTowns-dev] Video in repo

Augustin Trancart augustin.trancart at oslandia.com
Tue Jul 4 02:39:01 PDT 2017


Starting the clean now. Please don't push :-)


Augustin Trancart - Oslandia
augustin.trancart at oslandia.com

On 03/07/2017 19:13, Augustin Trancart wrote:
> To be more precise: a prerequisite for this is to manage to upload our docs to
> itowns.github.io. Pepp and I are currently working on this.
> 
> Augustin Trancart - Oslandia
> augustin.trancart at oslandia.com
> 
> On 03/07/2017 19:06, Augustin Trancart wrote:
>> Ok so, I intent to drastically reduce the size of the repo by removing from its
>> history the branches:
>> - gh-pages (only when deploy to itowns.github.io will work)
>> - gh-master
>>
>> and the files:
>> - dist/* (will be partly done by removal of gh-pages)
>> - build/*
>> - data/*
>> - resources/*
>> - doc/*
>> - src/Core/Commander/Providers/Potree/workers.js (and actually maybe Potree/
>> directly)
>> - src/ThirdParty
>> - examples/gpx/ULTRA2009.gpx
>> - API_Doc/ (should be done by removal of gh-pages)
>>
>> This implies a force-push on *all* the branches. Therefore, it is advised that
>> you *clone the repo back once it's done*. You'll probably need to resubmit your
>> PR. I can help for the rebase if necessary.
>>
>> I'll keep a copy of the repo just in case :-)
>>
>> Schedule: TOMORROW!
>>
>> If you see something wrong in this, please raise your hand !
>>
>> Augustin Trancart - Oslandia
>> augustin.trancart at oslandia.com
>>
>> PS: FYI, when aggressively testing locally, I reduce the repo size from 103Mb to
>> 3.9MB.
>>
>> On 29/06/2017 15:56, Augustin Trancart wrote:
>>> Ok, so I continued my investigation, and apart from this video, the size of the
>>> repo is also big because of the dist folder we commit to gh-pages at each
>>> merge... I'm pretty sure that does count more than the video itself (which
>>> shouldn't take more than it's compressed raw size, as it has not been changed
>>> since its appearance). And I don't really know how to workaround that.
>>>
>>> So I'm not sure it is worthy to rewrite the entire history for gaining just 20mb
>>> (max) of our 110mb repo any more. Maybe we should just live with it, as only the
>>> first clone is slow.
>>>
>>> Suggestions?
>>>
>>> Augustin Trancart - Oslandia
>>> augustin.trancart at oslandia.com
>>>
>>> On 29/06/2017 14:26, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-06-29 13:51 GMT+02:00 Augustin Trancart <augustin.trancart at oslandia.com
>>>> <mailto:augustin.trancart at oslandia.com>>:
>>>>
>>>>     I basically trust maintainer not to merge big files,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, you mean like for that video file? :troll:
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     but yes, if we can automate it, it's even better.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note that apparently aabc913 didn't went through a pull request, so we couldn't
>>>> have prevented it anyway (Travis could have failed, and then a push-force would
>>>> have been needed anyway)
>>>>
>>>> Cordialement,
>>>> -- 
>>>> Thomas Broyer
>>>> Atol Conseils et Développements
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> iTowns-dev mailing list
>>> iTowns-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/itowns-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> iTowns-dev mailing list
>> iTowns-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/itowns-dev
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iTowns-dev mailing list
> iTowns-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/itowns-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/itowns-dev/attachments/20170704/78afd82f/attachment.sig>


More information about the iTowns-dev mailing list