<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I've used MCC-Lidar <a
href="http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mcclidar/">http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mcclidar/</a>
a little with marginal results. Not a great answer but something.
TeraScan <a href="http://www.terrasolid.fi/en/products/terrascan">http://www.terrasolid.fi/en/products/terrascan</a>
is the elephant in that room.<br>
<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
On 03/03/2011 02:43 PM, Aaron Reyna wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTikTKrP1t7O++vJxbybrSFMOeVAZoKKgSXmBzGX1@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">This may be too broad of a question, but has anyone
seen or heard of a way to do efficient ground modeling with
libLAS? That is, take raw LiDAR files (all default points) and
model out the ground class? I do have raw LiDAR files if it helps.
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>Just throwing it out there.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Aaron
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Liblas-devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Liblas-devel@lists.osgeo.org">Liblas-devel@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Peter Tittmann
Geography Graduate Group
UC Davis
c. 707 849 4135</pre>
</body>
</html>