Ah yes,<div><br></div><div>I'll try the MCC-LiDAR. Great, thanks for the suggestion!</div><div><br></div><div>Aaron <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Peter Tittmann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pwtittmann@ucdavis.edu">pwtittmann@ucdavis.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I've used MCC-Lidar <a href="http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mcclidar/" target="_blank">http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mcclidar/</a>
a little with marginal results. Not a great answer but something.
TeraScan <a href="http://www.terrasolid.fi/en/products/terrascan" target="_blank">http://www.terrasolid.fi/en/products/terrascan</a>
is the elephant in that room.<br>
<br>
Peter<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 03/03/2011 02:43 PM, Aaron Reyna wrote:
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div></div><div class="h5">This may be too broad of a question, but has anyone
seen or heard of a way to do efficient ground modeling with
libLAS? That is, take raw LiDAR files (all default points) and
model out the ground class? I do have raw LiDAR files if it helps.
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>Just throwing it out there.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Aaron
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div></div><pre><fieldset></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Liblas-devel mailing list
<a href="mailto:Liblas-devel@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Liblas-devel@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre cols="72">--
Peter Tittmann
Geography Graduate Group
UC Davis
c. 707 849 4135</pre>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>