[Live-demo] Translations and Proj4 documentation

Cameron Shorter cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Tue Jun 20 13:45:50 PDT 2017


Hi Julien,

In case you missed it, I've reviewed your Proj4 Project Overview, pull 
request is here:

https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/pull/216

Thanks for your work.

On 17/6/17 7:19 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
>
> >> Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in 
> hospital, so she will be short on spare time for a bit.
>
> Thank you for telling me. I am sure she'd be back soon.
>
>
> >> I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this 
> weekend, from a readability point of view.
>
> I'm done with proj4 on my side : doc & iso 10.5 are good for me.
> I am about to pull request it.
>
> It would have been done whatever the release it is for. It wasn't so 
> much work to do.
>
> Regards,
> Julien.
>
> 2017-06-16 22:22 GMT+02:00 Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com 
> <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi Julien,
>
>     Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in
>     hospital, so she will be short on spare time for a bit.
>
>     I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this
>     weekend, from a readability point of view.
>
>     Warm regards, Cameron
>
>
>     On 16/6/17 7:15 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>>     Hi Vicky,
>>
>>     I am downloading the 10.5 iso in order to make the test.
>>
>>     I had a look to pgRouting's quickstart, and made a very few
>>     change : are you agree to be proj4's quickstart's reviewer ?
>>
>>     Regards,
>>     Julien.
>>
>>     2017-06-14 20:29 GMT+02:00 Julien Moquet <moquet.julien at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:moquet.julien at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>         Hi Vicky,
>>
>>         I am not in the incubating list as a human being, but metacrs
>>         is :
>>         http://www.osgeo.org/incubator
>>
>>
>>         I'll have a look on pgRouting.
>>
>>         Regards,
>>         Julien.
>>
>>
>>         2017-06-14 3:02 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de
>>         <mailto:vicky at georepublic.de>>:
>>
>>             Hello Julien,
>>
>>             Now about the documentation
>>             I see you've worked on your fork, these are the differences:
>>             is that correct?
>>             https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master
>>             <https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master>
>>
>>             I dont think you are incubating project (I dont see it in
>>             the list of incubating projects), so this might not apply.
>>
>>             .. image:: ../../images/logos/OSGeo_incubation.png
>>                :scale: 100 %
>>                :alt: OSGeo Project
>>                :align: right
>>                :target:http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html
>>             <http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html>
>>
>>>>             ​But I see you advanced a lot on the documentation 👍​
>>             ​You might as well do the PR so that the other members of
>>             the team can give you feed back.​
>>             ​Vicky.​
>>             ​​
>>             PS, in pgRouting   the documentation is done in such a
>>             way, to make minimal changes in further releases of OSGeo
>>             Live.
>>             On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Julien Moquet
>>             <moquet.julien at gmail.com
>>             <mailto:moquet.julien at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Hi Vicky,
>>                 My fork is up to date regarding the overview and
>>                 quickstart:
>>                 https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc
>>                 <https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc>
>>                 Before making a pull request, I need to test it over
>>                 the OsGeoLive-10.5 (on wednesday or thursday).
>>                 Although, as I read the sources.list include in this
>>                 version, I don't really think the latest proj4 will
>>                 be used.
>>                 The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the
>>                 stable 4.8.0-3 proj4 release to be used. See :
>>                 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/
>>                 <http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/>
>>
>>                 and
>>                 https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list
>>                 <https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list>
>>
>>                 That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4
>>                 release on its overview.
>>                 I only bypass the metacrs and stuff.
>>                 Regards,
>>                 Julien.
>>                 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara
>>                 <vicky at georepublic.de <mailto:vicky at georepublic.de>>:
>>
>>                     Hi Julien, et all
>>                     Maybe you can help me.
>>                     It so happened that I sent another mail asking
>>                     about what version to use, while reviewing today,
>>                     I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4.
>>                     (my mail merge skills are not so good)
>>                     So, here is the hand made mail:
>>                     Hi all, With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot,
>>                     we will be re-inserting each project into the
>>                     OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each
>>                     project has replied to confirm that they have
>>                     reviewed docs and verified the application works
>>                     as expected. Can you please:  0. Reply by return
>>                     email to confirm that you have recieved this
>>                     email and that you are able to check docs within
>>                     the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be better if you
>>                     can)  1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is
>>                     still accurate, or has been updated, (and version
>>                     numbers are correct)  2. Reply to confirm you
>>                     have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the
>>                     previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the
>>                     quickstart where needed.  We understand that
>>                     version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on
>>                     OSGeo-Live 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on
>>                     OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
>>                     (all in one reply is ok)
>>                     Full package status can be seen here:
>>                     https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
>>                     <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150>
>>                     Key Milestones ------------------- 18-Jun-2017   
>>                     All docs reviewed and verified 21-Jun-2017   
>>                     OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application
>>                     versions installed - Beta stage) 24-Jul-2017   
>>                     OSGeo-Live Final ISO 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017
>>                     Boston ... full schedule
>>                     http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
>>                     <http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB>
>>
>>                     On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter
>>                     <cameron.shorter at gmail.com
>>                     <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                         Hi Julien,
>>
>>                         Thanks for offering to help with
>>                         translations. I'm looping in Niko and Vicky
>>                         who are currently wrestling with trying to
>>                         get transifex to work. If you are familiar
>>                         with it, you might be able to help them.
>>
>>                         Warm regards, Cameron
>>
>>                         On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>>>                         Hi,
>>>                         >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been
>>>                         translated into other languages, including
>>>                         proj4js, ..." > Agreed that metacrs is
>>>                         probably a bit too ..
>>>                         I am fully agree too.
>>>                         And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages,
>>>                         I can help on the proj4 French Translation
>>>                         pages.
>>>                         Regards,
>>>                         2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault
>>>                         <even.rouault at spatialys.com
>>>                         <mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com>>:
>>>
>>>                             On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST
>>>                             Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>
>>>                             > Hi Evan,
>>>
>>>                             >
>>>
>>>                             > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering
>>>                             all the Proj4 projects together.
>>>
>>>                             > However, it appears that proj4 is the
>>>                             only project in that grouping
>>>
>>>                             > which is active?
>>>
>>>                             >
>>>
>>>                             > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS"
>>>                             should be dropped from OSGeo-Live
>>>
>>>                             > as a concept and "Proj4" be used
>>>                             instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4
>>>
>>>                             > has been translated into other
>>>                             languages, including proj4js, ..."
>>>
>>>                             >
>>>
>>>                             > Your thoughts are welcome.
>>>
>>>                             Regarding what is listed currently in
>>>                             metacrs :
>>>
>>>                             - proj4js: no opinion
>>>
>>>                             - cs-map: no-opinion
>>>
>>>                             - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used
>>>                             underneath by GDAL in particular, mostly
>>>                             in maintaince mode, but can be treated
>>>                             as a technical dependency that doesn't
>>>                             require to be visible from users.
>>>
>>>                             - proj4j: no opinion
>>>
>>>                             - spatialreference.org
>>>                             <http://spatialreference.org>: not
>>>                             maintained in years. http://epsg.io/
>>>                             would be a possible replacement
>>>
>>>                             Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit
>>>                             too ... meta for folks exploring
>>>                             OSGeo-Live content, so it could make
>>>                             sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone
>>>                             project.
>>>
>>>                             -- 
>>>
>>>                             Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>>>
>>>                             http://www.spatialys.com
>>>
>>                         -- 
>>                         Cameron Shorter
>>                         M+61 419 142 254 <tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>
>>
>>                     -- 
>>
>>                     Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>>                     Salzmannstraße 44,
>>                     81739 München, Germany
>>
>>                     Vicky Vergara
>>                     Operations Research
>>
>>                     eMail: vicky at georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de>
>>                     Web:https://georepublic.info
>>
>>                     Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>>                     Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>>                     Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>>                     CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>>             -- 
>>
>>             Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>>             Salzmannstraße 44,
>>             81739 München, Germany
>>
>>             Vicky Vergara
>>             Operations Research
>>
>>             eMail: vicky at georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de>
>>             Web:https://georepublic.info
>>
>>             Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>>             Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>>             Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>>             CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Live-demo mailing list
>>     Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org>
>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo>
>>     http://live.osgeo.org
>>     http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>>     <http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc>
>
>     -- 
>     Cameron Shorter
>     M+61 419 142 254 <tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>
>
-- 
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/attachments/20170621/32504168/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Live-demo mailing list