Indeed strange. Anyway - I can look if I can compile the maverick or natty package for lucid. It's a cleaner way to install than using a tarball. But I'd only do it if I'm sure that that version of osmosis is good for the live cd.<div>
<br></div><div>Johan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Hamish <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hamish_b@yahoo.com">hamish_b@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Johan wrote:<br>
> I don't use it so I cannot comment, but any problems with the<br>
> osmosis version included in lucid?<br>
> <a href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/lucid/osmosis" target="_blank">http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/lucid/osmosis</a><br>
<br>
</div>that's weird, it doesn't show up here:<br>
<a href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=osmosis" target="_blank">http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=osmosis</a><br>
or by<br>
lucid$ apt-cache search osmosis<br>
<br>
apparently it only exists there as a source package:<br>
<a href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=osmosis" target="_blank">http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=osmosis</a><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Hamish<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>