<html>
<head>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:48:36 +0200<br>> From: gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com<br>> To: live-demo@lists.osgeo.org; pycsw-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; deegree-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<br>> CC: <br>> Subject: [Live-demo] Common Metadata set in OSGeoLive 6.0 and forward...<br>> <br>> Greetings everyone.<br>> <br>> Following the latest release of OSGeoLive 5.5, I would like to bring up <br>> an idea that was suggested in OSGeoLive mailing list.<br>> <br>> It would be a very good idea for CSW projects in the disk to work <br>> together in order to create a single set of XML metadata files, that <br>> would be loaded in all CSW servers. This would make OSGeoLive testing <br>> more consistent to the end user and easier to follow in quickstart guides.<br>> <br>> Also I feel that this common dataset would make our life easier in <br>> development and testing.<br>> <br>> Finally it could be a nice way to start implementing common examples <br>> like Harvesting or Distributed CSW searches within the disk.<br>> <br>> Thoughts?<br>> <br>> Regards,<br>> Angelos<br>> <br>> PS. I suggest moving this discussion in live-demo list for less <br>> cross-posting, than I already did :)<br>> <br><br>Agreed. pycsw ships with an SQLite database of the OGC CSW CITE test data, but it would be valuable to have a common set of FGDC and ISO documents (in XML).<br><br>I also think it would be valuable to have CSW 'shootouts' in the future (thoughts?), but let's start with common sample metadata first.<br><br>Does anyone have any sample metadata suggestions?<br><br>..Tom<br><br></div></div>
</div></body>
</html>