<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1255"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<style>body p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; } </style>
</head>
<body bidimailui-detected-decoding-type="preferred-charset"
bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#660000">
<p>On 17/06/2012 22:57, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4FDE36B1.7040603@gmail.com" type="cite">On
06/17/2012 10:21 PM, Micha Silver wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 06/17/2012 12:39 PM, Angelos Tzotsos
wrote:
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Yes I believe this is a good suggestion.
<br>
I agree to have this mixture of compiled and pre-packaged
binaries, it is better than having unstable or outdated non
working versions.
<br>
But I have to ask:
<br>
Why is there a problem with dependencies in UbuntuGIS and we
won't have the same when compiling the GUI part from source?
<br>
</blockquote>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I also would like to better understand what the block is. Maybe
this will throw some light on the issue:</p>
<p><a
href="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.grass.pkg.devel/12677">http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.grass.pkg.devel/12677</a></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>
<blockquote cite="mid:4FDE36B1.7040603@gmail.com" type="cite">Regards,
<br>
Angelos
<br>
</blockquote>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Micha Silver
052-3665918
</pre>
</body>
</html>