<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Thanks for the feedback all,<br>
Lets stick with your advise and keep tinyows and mapserver as 2
projects.<br>
<br>
On 09/02/14 03:02, Steve Lime wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMrKZ9-ksgHyKR7izcjo1ER7XiqngPygNKqdGOYfru-=dw_=TA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">With two distinct user groups I'd stick w/separate.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Steve<br>
<br>
On Monday, February 3, 2014, Cameron Shorter <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 03/02/14
22:27, Olivier Courtin wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Feb 1, 2014, at 9:14 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:<br>
<br>
Cameron,<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I'd be interested to hear you expand upon your thoughts.<br>
</blockquote>
There's somehow two kind of community users for TinyOWS:<br>
<br>
- First one is tied to MapServer, and as you mentionned,<br>
aim is to have a full OGC Web Service implementation<br>
(WMS + WFS-T + TMS). So MapServer Suite.<br>
- Second community is more linked with QGIS usage,<br>
and only care about WFS-T. So only need PostGIS +
TinyOWS.<br>
<br>
<br>
So from my point of view, there's a gain to simplify
installation<br>
process, in Live Demo for the MapServer Suite users,<br>
as long as you keep it simple too, for those who don't
really<br>
need MapServer.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
HTH,<br>
<br>
O.<br>
</blockquote>
Thanks for the clarification Olivier.<br>
For the install scripts, I'd be comfortable with the
install_mapserver.sh script to call the install_tinyows.sh
script, which I think addresses your point about having an
installation process for QGIS users.<br>
<br>
Would it make sense to merge the Mapserver / TinyOWS docs? Or
should they remain separate?<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Cameron Shorter,<br>
Software and Data Solutions Manager<br>
LISAsoft<br>
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,<br>
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009<br>
<br>
P +61 2 9009 5000, W <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.lisasoft.com" target="_blank">www.lisasoft.com</a>,
F +61 2 9009 5099<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P +61 2 9009 5000, W <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.lisasoft.com">www.lisasoft.com</a>, F +61 2 9009 5099</pre>
</body>
</html>