<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Hi Jody,</p>
    <p>Some help from the marketing team with a mock up would be
      welcomed. (While we agreed on a concept of a "play" icon we
      haven't had a volunteer step up to create the logo).</p>
    <p>I hadn't read the overnight email trail before our OSGeo-Live
      meeting (an issue with being on a 6:30am conference call).
      Although we voted for the Play icon, I can see potential in the
      lightning emoji that Ben suggested as well. It would be
      interesting to see a mock up of a "OSGeo⚡LIVE" as well.</p>
    <p>Maybe have the "play" button for the icon, and "OSGeo⚡LIVE" for
      text. <br>
    </p>
    <p>Re fonts and colours, I expect existing fonts and colours should
      be fine. </p>
    <p>Jugen, re the "playground" suggestion. While I see potential
      value in it, but could be seen as child and not a serious option.
      (We do want OSGeo-Live to be taken seriously.)</p>
    <p>Warm regards, Cameron<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/8/17 4:37 pm, Jürgen E. Fischer
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:20170829063741.cpfrpcom2kk2xfqr@norbit.de">
      <pre wrap="">Hm, reading "play" triggered a association with "playground" here - while the
meant "play" is more used for consuming a film something.

How about using something like
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pictograms-nps-land-playground.svg">https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pictograms-nps-land-playground.svg</a> ?</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 28/8/17 2:09 pm, Jody Garnett wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOhbgAmYMLC769YopNX--PZq+K0ScGPo+oDWcOc5OZ-wxq4RVg@mail.gmail.com">Oh
      wow Ben - do it like OSGeo:UK bur using emoji "OSGeo⚡LIVE"<br>
      <br>
      Points for Thunderstruck reference now I have it stuck in my head.
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr">On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:21 PM Ben
          Caradoc-Davies <<a href="mailto:ben@transient.nz">ben@transient.nz</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
          .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I like
          neither the heart (more "love" than "live") nor the laptop
          (too<br>
          complex and tied to one technology). I think more of live
          electricity<br>
          and live performance.<br>
          <br>
          How about a lightning symbol? Or just leave the nice clean new
          OSGeo<br>
          compass and use the text "Live" or "LIVE" or "⚡ LIVE ⚡" (with
          the<br>
          Unicode HIGH VOLTAGE SIGN) where projects have "Project"? This
          would<br>
          avoid brand dilution. Something like:<br>
          <br>
          OSGeo<br>
          ⚡ LIVE ⚡</blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 30/8/17 5:12 am, Jody Garnett wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOhbgAn4gqHmTyTUap1DXtO79_wy=hk=qquQKGzuU9c0pvE53Q@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">I like it - good insight!
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>The marketing committee is here to encourage everyone, so
          if you are happy we are happy.
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Do you need a hand making a mock up or are enough assets
            available in github for you to work with? I am also
            interested in application of fonts and text, are there
            enough options for the OSGeo live team to work with?</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
        <div>
          <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>--</div>
                  <div>Jody Garnett</div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On 28 August 2017 at 18:13, Cameron
          Shorter <span dir="ltr"><<a
              href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
              <div class="m_6697459159517603047moz-cite-prefix">All, in
                our OSGeo-Live weekly meeting today [1] we discuss a new
                OSGeo-Live logo and came to the conclusion that a "Play"
                logo would be a good way to convey what we stand for.
                (OSGeo-Live allows people to run OSGeo applications).
                While a traditional play logo is a right pointing
                triangle in a circle, we were thinking we could put a
                right pointing logo inside the outer ring of the OSGeo
                logo (replacing the inner star).<br>
                <br>
                This would address our goal of being tied to OSGeo, but
                also linking to our project attributes.<br>
                <br>
                Is this something that people in the marketing committee
                would consider acceptable? (Hopefully so, as a prior
                suggestion from the marketing committee was similar -
                putting a heart in the middle of the OSGeo ring).<br>
                <br>
                Warm regards, Cameron<br>
                <br>
                [1] <a
                  class="m_6697459159517603047moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="http://irclogs.geoapt.com/osgeolive/%23osgeolive.2017-08-28.log"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://irclogs.geoapt.com/<wbr>osgeolive/%23osgeolive.2017-<wbr>08-28.log</a>
                <div>
                  <div class="h5"><br>
                    <br>
                    On 28-Aug-17 2:25 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div class="h5">
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>What we did in the style guide is be clear
                        about what is going on:</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>1) osgeo mark and logo</div>
                      <div>2) sub brands - use the osgeo mark with
                        different text (two presentations are available
                        to allow of OSGeo:UK style)</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>And then:</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>3) distinct brands - use their own mark.
                        Distinct marks are able to use the color and
                        fonts and some branding elements to be visually
                        part of OSGeo (but because they use their own
                        mark they are forming a distinct  brand)</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>We have used GeoForAll and OSGeo Live as
                        examples of distinct brands.</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>This was a case of us not being familiar with
                        the terminology around branding, hopefully armed
                        with the above breakdown it will be easier to
                        explain.</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>We went back with the graphics designer
                        multiple times learning more each meeting. This
                        produced things like the OSGeo:UK alternate text
                        for a sub brand, and experimented with a few
                        examples of distinct brands. We also have some
                        unknowns, specifically what to do on twitter and
                        facebook for avatar pictures for osgeo local
                        chapter feeds. We would like to use the osgeo
                        mark unaltered but the format does not allow for
                        that and the circle avatar design target limits
                        options (it is intended for a face after all).</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>Please have a look at page 5 of the style
                        guide at the top of this thread.</div>
                      <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
                        0px 0px
0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">See
                        page 5 here - <a
href="https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/blob/master/marketing/branding/styleguide-osgeo.pdf"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/OSGeo/osg<wbr>eo/blob/master/marketing/brand<wbr>ing/styleguide-osgeo.pdf</a></blockquote>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>From the marketing committee perspective we
                        have as you say "just invested in a
                        professionally developed corporate identity,
                        logo and guidelines". It will take a bit of hand
                        holding, and some tradeoffs, as we explain
                        options to projects, local chapters and
                        committees.</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>With respect to this weeks meeting we should
                        focus on the website site map gap analysis,
                        prioritizing the outstanding issues (whole
                        sections of the website do not work yet), and
                        complete the contract with Get Interactive in a
                        timely fashion. I would not feel good about
                        going back to the sub brand handling for a forth
                        time. Several groups had a chance for direct 1
                        on 1 during the code sprint and we should move
                        on to finishing this project.</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>By the same token we are iterating on the
                        choose-a-project graphics; while I was able to
                        offer some clarifications during the code sprint
                        I would really applicate some backup by someone
                        with more cartographic & analsyis experience
                        then me. In many senses I am just a developer
                        and we need input from someone with more
                        experience of our target audience than I can
                        provided.<br>
                      </div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
                      <div>
                        <div
                          class="m_6697459159517603047gmail_signature"
                          data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div>
                              <div dir="ltr">
                                <div>--</div>
                                <div>Jody Garnett</div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">On 27 August 2017 at
                        01:52, Steven Feldman <span dir="ltr"><<a
                            href="mailto:shfeldman@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">shfeldman@gmail.com</a>></span>
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
                          0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                          solid;padding-left:1ex">We have just invested
                          in a professionally developed corporate
                          identity, logo and guidelines. I disagree with
                          Cameron (doesn't happen often) on allowing a
                          high degree of flexibility in the user of the
                          logo and interpretation of the guidelines.<br>
                          <br>
                          Let's try to follow the guidelines as closely
                          as possible - use the logo as intended or
                          continue with a project specific logo and have
                          a small OSGeo logo separately, don't change
                          the logo colours. Let's note any problems we
                          encounter and review after a year<br>
                          <br>
                          Steven<br>
                          <br>
                          <br>
                          > On 26 Aug 2017, at 21:00, <a
                            href="mailto:marketing-request@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marketing-request@lists.osgeo.<wbr>org</a>
                          wrote:<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Send Marketing mailing list submissions
                          to<br>
                          >    <a
                            href="mailto:marketing@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
                          ><br>
                          > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
                          Wide Web, visit<br>
                          >    <a
                            href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                            moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/marketing</a><br>
                          > or, via email, send a message with
                          subject or body 'help' to<br>
                          >    <a
                            href="mailto:marketing-request@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marketing-request@lists.osgeo.<wbr>org</a><br>
                          ><br>
                          > You can reach the person managing the
                          list at<br>
                          >    <a
                            href="mailto:marketing-owner@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marketing-owner@lists.osgeo.or<wbr>g</a><br>
                          ><br>
                          > When replying, please edit your Subject
                          line so it is more specific<br>
                          > than "Re: Contents of Marketing
                          digest..."<br>
                          ><br>
                          ><br>
                          > Today's Topics:<br>
                          ><br>
                          >   1. Re: [Live-demo] osgeo live logo,   
                          and website presentation<br>
                          >      (Cameron Shorter)<br>
                          ><br>
                          ><br>
                          > ------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>----------<br>
                          ><br>
                          > Message: 1<br>
                          > Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 04:03:56 +1000<br>
                          > From: Cameron Shorter <<a
                            href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>><br>
                          > To: Angelos Tzotsos <<a
                            href="mailto:gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com</a>>,
                          Jody Garnett<br>
                          >    <<a
                            href="mailto:jody.garnett@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">jody.garnett@gmail.com</a>><br>
                          > Cc: "<a
                            href="mailto:live-demo@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">live-demo@lists.osgeo.org</a>"
                          <<a href="mailto:live-demo@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">live-demo@lists.osgeo.org</a>>,<br>
                          >    "<a
                            href="mailto:marketing@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a>"
                          <<a href="mailto:marketing@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
                          > Subject: Re: [Marketing] [Live-demo]
                          osgeo live logo,    and website<br>
                          >    presentation<br>
                          > Message-ID: <<a
                            href="mailto:9783ae77-d3c3-9779-0e96-e821c92bbe93@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">9783ae77-d3c3-9779-0e96-e821c<wbr>92bbe93@gmail.com</a>><br>
                          > Content-Type: text/plain;
                          charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"<br>
                          <div>
                            <div class="m_6697459159517603047h5">><br>
                              > Jody, others,<br>
                              ><br>
                              > Looking at the branding style guide,
                              there is some ambiguity between the<br>
                              > goal of allowing sub-brands (which
                              would involve being creative with how<br>
                              > the logo is used with other graphical
                              concepts) and dos and don'ts which<br>
                              > state not changing the logo. I
                              suggest Dos and Don'ts be suggestions and<br>
                              > goals rather than hard rules in order
                              to enable people to be creative.<br>
                              > Eg: if a chapter wanted to use their
                              country's flag colours within the<br>
                              > logo, I think that should be ok. It
                              is in the designer's interest to try<br>
                              > and align with the core OSGeo-Logo,
                              so they will likely do a good job of<br>
                              > making it obvious there are OSGeo
                              roots.<br>
                              ><br>
                              > Eg: Spanish logo:<br>
                              > <a
href="https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Cap%C3%ADtulo_Local_de_la_comunidad_hispanohablante"
                                rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                                moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Ca<wbr>p%C3%ADtulo_Local_de_la_comuni<wbr>dad_hispanohablante</a><br>
                              ><br>
                              > For OSGeo-Live, I'm expecting we will
                              want to work out a way to weave a<br>
                              > heart (or some other image aligned
                              with "live") into the logo somehow.<br>
                              > We may want to retain the blue heart.
                              That should be ok and up to us to<br>
                              > do a good job of deciding that.<br>
                              ><br>
                              > You might notice OSGeo-Live has
                              broken the style guide by using the logo<br>
                              > in over another image in our
                              screenshot:<br>
                              ><br>
                              > <a
                                href="https://live.osgeo.org/_images/osgeolive_menu.png"
                                rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                                moz-do-not-send="true">https://live.osgeo.org/_images<wbr>/osgeolive_menu.png</a><br>
                              ><br>
                              > In previous releases we have used
                              washed out versions of the logo, of<br>
                              > large, off-center parts of the logo.
                              It was artistic and looked good,<br>
                              > and provided the link back to OSGeo.
                              We should empower the creative<br>
                              > people in our community to be
                              creative in that way.<br>
                              ><br>
                              > The guide is prescriptive about only
                              being shown on a white background.<br>
                              > Again, that should be a
                              recommendation rather than a rule. If I
                              have a<br>
                              > presentation template with a light
                              blue background, I should be able to<br>
                              > put a logo over the top, without
                              needing to create a white square to put<br>
                              > under it. As a creator, I should be
                              able to decide which looks best.<br>
                              ><br>
                              > Cheers, Cameron<br>
                              ><br>
                              ><br>
                              >><br>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                          ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                          Marketing mailing list<br>
                          <a href="mailto:Marketing@lists.osgeo.org"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
                          <a
                            href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing"
                            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                            moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/marketing</a></blockquote>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                    <fieldset
                      class="m_6697459159517603047mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                    <br>
                    <pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Marketing mailing list
<a class="m_6697459159517603047moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Marketing@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Marketing@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="m_6697459159517603047moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/marketing</a></pre>
                  </blockquote>
                  <p><br>
                  </p>
                </div>
              </div>
              <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
                  <pre class="m_6697459159517603047moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Cameron Shorter, Software and Data Solutions Manager, 
Jirotech Pty Ltd,
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf, 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P <a href="tel:+61%202%208099%209000" value="+61280999000" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">+61 2 8099 9000</a>, M <a href="tel:+61%20419%20142%20254" value="+61419142254" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">+61 419 142 254</a>, W <a class="m_6697459159517603047moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.jirotech.com" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">www.jirotech.com</a>

P <a href="tel:+61%202%208099%209000" value="+61280999000" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">+61 2 8099 9000</a>, M <a href="tel:+61%20419%20142%20254" value="+61419142254" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">+61 419 142 254</a>, W <a class="m_6697459159517603047moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.jirotech.com" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">www.jirotech.com</a></pre>
                </font></span></div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254</pre>
  </body>
</html>