<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div class="">
<div style="text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">As stated, our coverage is "far" to be complete, this is a work in progress, but it should work "well enough"...</span></div>
</div>
<div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Le 2 déc. 2019 à 10:36, Paolo Cavallini <<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" class="">cavallini@faunalia.it</a>> a écrit :</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Thanks David. So current release (3.3.2) is expected to work "well<br class="">enough" with QGIS 3.10 already?<br class="">Cheers.<br class=""><br class="">Il 02/12/19 10:33, David Marteau ha scritto:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Hi Paolo<br class=""><br class="">As much as possible, we are testing against Qgis ltr, release,<br class="">nightly-ltr and nightly-release in our CI workflow. This is not yet a<br class="">complete coverage but<br class="">we expect to detect major failures and incompatibility.<br class=""> <br class="">-- <br class="">David Marteau <br class="">Responsable Infrastructure<br class=""><a href="http://www.3liz.com" class="">www.3liz.com</a> <<a href="http://www.3liz.com" class="">http://www.3liz.com</a>> <br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Le 2 déc. 2019 à 09:24, Paolo Cavallini <<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" class="">cavallini@faunalia.it</a><br class=""><<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" class="">mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it</a>>> a écrit :<br class=""><br class="">Hi all,<br class="">given all the trouble with gdal/proj migration, missing support for QGIS<br class="">3.4 etc, it is quite likely that we'll end up breaking 3.4 in major<br class="">distros (Debian, Ubuntu etc.), so it seems safe to me to include QGIS<br class="">3.10 support in Lizmap as soon as possible. Are there plans for this?<br class="">Any idea of how much work is involved?<br class="">Cheers.<br class="">-- <br class="">Paolo Cavallini - <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" class="">www.faunalia.eu</a> <<a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" class="">http://www.faunalia.eu</a>><br class=""><a href="http://QGIS.ORG" class="">QGIS.ORG</a> <<a href="http://QGIS.ORG" class="">http://QGIS.ORG</a>> Chair:<br class=""><a href="http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/" class="">http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/</a><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Lizmap mailing list<br class="">Lizmap@lists.osgeo.org<br class="">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/lizmap<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""></blockquote><br class="">-- <br class="">Paolo Cavallini - <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" class="">www.faunalia.eu</a><br class=""><a href="http://QGIS.ORG" class="">QGIS.ORG</a> Chair:<br class=""><a href="http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/" class="">http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/</a><br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>