[mapguide-internals]MapGuideRFC19-ConcurrentFDOproviderconnections

[Paul Spencer]

Then I misunderstood :)  Thanks for explaining it more clearly.

Cheers

Paul

On 19-Apr-07, at 12:53 PM, Bruce Dechant wrote:

> Paul,
>
> This is not a hack. It actually does handle the problem. Perhaps my
> example was not clear. I can update the RFC with more examples and  
> more
> detailed explanation.
>
> The settings listed in the RFC are to allow you to restrict the # of
> concurrent connections. However, this will be overridden by the server
> if when it checks the provider and discovers that the thread model
> supported is only single threaded. In the single threaded case at most
> only 1 connection will be allowed at a time regardless of what the  
> user
> may have entered in the configuration settings.
>
> Example: OsGeo.Gdal:10 means at most 10 concurrent connections, but if
> the thread model checked by the server is single-threaded the server
> will enforce a maximum of 1 concurrent connection and ignore this
> setting as it is not valid.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul
> Spencer (External)
> Sent: April 19, 2007 10:48 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re:
> [mapguide-internals]MapGuideRFC19-ConcurrentFDOproviderconnections
>
> +0 Paul
>
> I think it is important, but this is essentially a hack to make
> things work and doesn't address the actual underlying problem.
>
> Also, using the proposed syntax, how will multiple restrictions be
> handled?  The example just shows a single provider but it is
> important to show how multiples could be specified.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> On 18-Apr-07, at 2:04 PM, Jason Birch wrote:
>
>> I'm going to consider that a motion for an accelerated vote on RFC  
>> 19.
>>
>> Given the importance of this RFC, I support this motion (seconded)  
>> and
>> vote +1
>>
>> Jason :)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of  
>> Bruce
>> Dechant
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:55
>> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
>> Subject: RE:
>> [mapguide-internals]MapGuideRFC19-ConcurrentFDOproviderconnections
>>
>> Any objections to me posting this for approval sooner then after the
>> typical week of discussion?
>>
>> I would like to get it into the MGOS 1.2 Beta 2.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bruce
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Paul Spencer                          pspencer at dmsolutions.ca    |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Chief Technology Officer                                         |
> |DM Solutions Group Inc                http://www.dmsolutions.ca/ |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer                          pspencer at dmsolutions.ca    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Chief Technology Officer                                         |
|DM Solutions Group Inc                http://www.dmsolutions.ca/ |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+