[mapguide-internals] Coordinate System question

[Jason Birch]

Thanks very much for the comprehensive answer Norm!

Jason

On 12 July 2010 11:40, Norm Olsen wrote:

> The two definitions are identical (mathematically).
> The information in spatialreference.org is correct.
> You can use either one and get the same numerical results.  I you want to
> be strictly correct with regard to the EPSG code, you should use the
> ETRS89.UTM-31N as that is what the NameMapper facility will map the provided
> EPSG code to.
>
>