[mapguide-internals] RE: Vroom Vroom CPU

[Dave Wilson]

The problem with 48 cores isn't the number of users, but the disk IO bottleneck you will likely experience if the data isn't being read from either SATA III or SSD drives and even then who knows. And if a provider isn't properly multi-threaded it's all go until that one layer blocks everything.

New fun is on the horizon that is for sure.

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:15 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Vroom Vroom CPU


I would do single-user real time ray-tracing with 48 cores.


Unrelated to MapGuide, I know. :)


Traian


-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:21 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Vroom Vroom CPU

http://www.provantage.com/amd-os6172wktcego~7AAMD2EE.htm

The official release should be next week. This chip is also 4 socket capable.  Now what we do with 48 cores...  100, 200, 300 concurrent users?  Maybe more?

Who wants to buy me 4 and a box to go around it?

I will colocate it so we can all use it.  One little condition though - I get punting rights :)

My colo is going to kill me.  You already have 20 amps! Greedy *******!


Regards,
Trevor 

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals