<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<STYLE type=text/css>.message {
FONT-SIZE: 9pt; BACKGROUND: white; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial'
}
.message P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0em; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0em
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY class=message bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>Hi,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>Locator is subset of Spatial. the part it has works 100% as
Spatial.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>Missing is GeoRaster, Topology, Network and some
functions,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>but other stuff is same as in Spatial.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>I like your architecture, It is one we use the most
often.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>I didn't understand where this part "<FONT color=#000000>A Third
party Query Application" <FONT color=#0000ff>comes in, </FONT>in
MAP?</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT size=2>Lately I am
using XE also .</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=656283209-06112006><FONT
size=2>Haris</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> shailesh
[mailto:shailesh@simplexindia.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, November 06, 2006
7:07 AM<BR><B>To:</B> users@mapguide.osgeo.org<BR><B>Subject:</B>
[mapguide-users] Locator v/s spatial<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Hi all,<BR>I have read thru previous discussion on Locator v/s
spatial. <BR>I just wanted to confirm - <BR>Can Locator (which comes builtin
with the Oracle SE) be a complete substitute to Oracle spatial. What is the
TradeOff ?<BR><BR>Has some one already implemented - Mapguide Ent. / OS on
Locator . Any critical observations ?<BR><BR>The architecture we are planning is
:<BR>Autodesk MAP 3D for map creation and editing - <BR>A Third party Query
Application with builtin GIS modules , which works good on Locator <BR>And a web
based module on Mapguide enterprise . <BR>All these would be based on spatial
data and feature data stored in Oracle. <BR><BR><BR>Any Comments Suggestions on
the architecture are most welcome
<BR><BR><BR><BR>---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@mapguide.osgeo.org For additional
commands, e-mail: users-help@mapguide.osgeo.org </BODY></HTML>