<div>I am using Feature Joins for production purposes and the performance is satisfactory on large datasets as long as the pooling is enabled with the SDF FDO Provider.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I try to split features into those that are critical requiring dynamic joins and those that are static and can be batchscripted to be done on a scheduled basis.</div>
<div>This allows an optimum map performance without losing the ability of having layers show live database updates.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Still using 1.2 release - will be upgrading to the latest over the holidays, so I havent yet seen the gains made with the new version.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The 1.2 release has significant issues in regards to join operating properly - so the data and the key IDs have to be spot on to display properly.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kori Maleski </div>
<div><br><br> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Jackie Ng <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jumpinjackie@gmail.com">jumpinjackie@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br><br>I'd like to hear other people's experiences with feature joins. Is your<br>experience better/worse?<br>
<br>- Jackie<br><font color="#888888">--<br>View this message in context: <a href="http://n2.nabble.com/Does-anyone-use-Feature-Joins--tp1646599p1646599.html" target="_blank">http://n2.nabble.com/Does-anyone-use-Feature-Joins--tp1646599p1646599.html</a><br>
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>mapguide-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org">mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users</a><br></font></blockquote></div><br>