<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I disagree that a one-hour timeout is better.<br>
If a user keeps pressing "reload" in the browser, you get a huge number
of sessions created within an hour.<br>
<br>
The problem (also with notifying the user) will be fixed in 2.2:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc66">http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc66</a><br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
</pre>
<br>
<br>
Gabriele Monfardini skrev:
<blockquote
cite="mid:b28779190911060826q24340431ya668c05ae42c1e74@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Under the presumption that the user didn't do anything during that 10 minutes... This is by design. There is a timeout which clears your user session if no activity occurs. It's a good thing.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
It would be a good thing if:
- default timeout was longer, at least 1 hour (maybe the user is not
doing anything with the map, but he's working with the data related to
the map).
- users were informed that session has expired and they have to reload
the page (losing placement and zoom level, not to mention object in
redlining layers).
It is not a case that many end up pinging manually the server...
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org">mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>