<div>MapAgent should be accessible under /mapguide/mapagent/mapagent.fcgi with the tests under /mapguide/mapagent/index.html (or something like that)?</div><div><br></div>For some subset of functionality (that used by developers and active testers) Fusion works great, and is a lot faster than previous versions especially if you do a custom build. There are still performance problems with maps containing large numbers of layers, and there are probably lots and lots of edge cases out there to be stumbled over. <div>
<br></div><div>It's a bit of chicken and egg. If people don't start using/testing it, the problems won't get found and fixed. Of course, if they're found there also needs to be reproducible test cases submitted to the Fusion Trac instance, developer time to address, etc, so I wouldn't go into a Fusion project expecting rapid deployment unless I had resources to throw at it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Jason<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/12/3 djonio<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br>
Jason,<br>
<div class="im">Is mapviewerajax set up as an alias to mapviewernet and set as an<br>
application?<br>
<br>
</div>Yes it is/was. I wanted to play with mapagent.<br>
What is your opinion: Do I dare work with fusion?<br>
<br>
r,<br>
dennis<br><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote></div></div>