<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>Don’t get me wrong: I like the concept. You’ll get no disagreement from me as to the benefits of keeping up with technology. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>In my experience, though, some of the largest organizations (both corporate and governmental) are the slowest to adopt the latest technology—and the most likely to be affected. Perhaps this change will be all that’s needed to convince those lagging organizations to upgrade…. </span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:blue'>J</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>--Chad<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Jackie Ng<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>Sent:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Wednesday, July 10 2013 8:08 PM<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: Re-thinking Fusion redlining efficiency<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>It depends. <br><br>Do we want to live in 2013? In the age of modern web browsers? Then we have HTML5 offline storage APIs at our disposal to stash client-side redline objects that can live through browser refreshes and restarts. <br><br>Do we have to support IE <= 8? I'm not going to bother answering that one :P <br><br>- Jackie<span style='color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div>
<br/><hr align="left" width="300" />
View this message in context: <a href="http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-thinking-Fusion-redlining-efficiency-tp5065272p5065759.html">RE: Re-thinking Fusion redlining efficiency</a><br/>
Sent from the <a href="http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/MapGuide-Users-f4182607.html">MapGuide Users mailing list archive</a> at Nabble.com.<br/>