<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RE: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=812082809-02112006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>+1</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Bruce Dechant
[mailto:bruce.dechant@autodesk.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, November 02, 2006
5:10 AM<BR><B>To:</B> psc@mapguide.osgeo.org;
psc@mapguide.osgeo.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV
list<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>+1</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT size=2>-----Original Message----- <BR><B>From:</B> Andy Morsell
[mailto:amorsell@spatialgis.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Wed 11/1/2006 7:33 PM
<BR><B>To:</B> psc@mapguide.osgeo.org <BR><B>Cc:</B> <BR><B>Subject:</B> RE:
[mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>+1. I guess I should subscribe to the dev list
now..........<BR><BR><BR>Andy<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
Robert Bray [<A
href="mailto:rbray@robertbray.net">mailto:rbray@robertbray.net</A>]<BR>Sent:
Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:27 PM<BR>To: psc@mapguide.osgeo.org<BR>Subject:
Re: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list<BR><BR>I'll second and
+1.<BR><BR>Bob<BR><BR>Jason Birch wrote:<BR>> Given the lack of objections,
I'd like to move to archive the PSC list<BR>> and move all future
discussions to the DEV list.<BR>><BR>> Consider this a +1 once somebody
second's.<BR>><BR>> Jason<BR>><BR>> -----Original
Message-----<BR>> From: Daniel Morissette [<A
href="mailto:dmorissette@mapgears.com">mailto:dmorissette@mapgears.com</A>]<BR>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 13:10<BR>> To:
psc@mapguide.osgeo.org<BR>> Subject: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV
list<BR>><BR>> After seeing the discussions on RFC-1 split between the
PSC and DEV<BR>> lists, it seems to me that having split PSC and DEV lists
results in<BR>> duplicate messages for those on both lists and on partial
threads for<BR>> those only on one list. In both cases that's no good. Am I
the only<BR>> one to think this way?<BR>><BR>> Would we not be better
with just one list? Or if we insist on having<BR>> two lists then discuss
RFCs and all technical issues to the -dev list<BR>> *only* (including the
vote), with the understanding that PSC members<BR>> are required to follow
the -dev list?<BR>><BR>> Daniel<BR>> --<BR>> Daniel
Morissette<BR>> <A
href="http://www.mapgears.com/">http://www.mapgears.com/</A><BR>><BR>> <BR><BR><BR><BR></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>